Kitabı oku: «The 7 Portals of the Spirit»

The Seven Portals of the Spirit
1. Our World
The models of reality

Primarily this is about the question of what is actually the essence of our world: Is this world really what it seems to be in our eyes? Or is our perception of the world only the result of an collective world image, the essence of the current public opinion of our collectively educated imagination that we pass on to each other.

Let us go back to our childhood: Was it not the case that our parents were the first ones that told us how we where to perceive the world; a mystically shining point of light proved to be just a normal ashtray made of glass that father is using to get rid of his cigarettes. The whole mystical world full of magic was reduced to its functionality. Therefore every object has lost its magic within its mysterious atmosphere, which we were able to see when we where children, and was shrunk to its function that was determined by the grown up persons. And so we slowly grew into the normal world the way human beings see it. And the more we where able to convince the elders that we see the world exactly the way they do the more praise and applause we where assured to receive. When we grew older the grown ups projected their religious images onto us. We where told how this world came into being and what the aims and the sense of human existence are. Because our infantile “hard disk” was still empty, we where thankful to receive the first terminologies with which we could explore and perceive the outer world with our educated imagination. Because the concept that has been passed on from generation to generation is the only benchmark after which we could experience reality, the lessons in life had the supporting side effect that the world showed itself to us exactly the way we learned to perceive it. At this point we had no idea that there would be no other possibility to experience the world in a different way. On the other hand we can learn how difficult it is to change the familial or religious background from the point of view we have today because they are so deep within ourselves that we cannot see them just like the famous “blind spot”.

What can we realize?

That is why it is important to keep in mind that our educated perception is after all a construction that ensures our social coexistence with our fellow beings. In an overcrowded, highly differenced world that has already left behind all natural resources, a natural and healthy survival is not possible any more. Our economical system is a rambling, cancerous ulcer that can only keep its balance through perpetual growth. Our complex society could not afford its national product without virtual needs that ensure the life standard of its consuming clients. The world would stand still in one moment if we would not accept – would it be only for a moment – the functionality of the banks, the money-systems or the human images and imaginations. If we would question the very basis we stand upon we would loose the ground on which we can base our existence: The world would dissolve in front of our eyes or it would break apart like a dried piece of cake.

On the other hand crisis is always a necessary part of development. It is the coming forth of a development that lies within humanity itself and that one could describe with fear and greed. The international network in the era of the internet has anticipated this process and it is not the duty of mankind to learn from it. As cynical as it may sound, that would stop the progress. Human development was never based on following its own tracks backward, on reversal or on returning but it always lies within the fact that the solutions for the problems of today are the problems of tomorrow, which yet again require the solutions for the day after tomorrow. That is important to know if we want to look forward to the future with a relaxed attitude: There is no paradise to be found for us nor is there salvation that could make us happy. There are only goals that embody the illusions that tell us that we would one day be happy should we be able to achieve them, because happy people are not willing to fulfil the preconditions of a steadily growing environment in progress. Because, should the human being would stop his urge to grow, everything would collapse. That is to say: We are forced to focus on a paradise that we are constantly trying to reach without noticing that it would be the end of our system if we would find it.

The subliminal mechanisms of our social models

That is why we have to realize that the achievements that precondition improvement and preservation for our life-standard are the very ones that at the same time undermine and destroy them. It is said that every crisis is initiated by mankind, but this statement is not precise: Crisis’s are initiated by the inventories and systems that have been programmed into the human mind and through the human urge to realize these inventories and models. Self-appointed teachers and policemen often fail to realize that they set the preconditions for further injustice by trying to avoid or avenge it. By fighting the so called “evil” they chase “evil within the others” instead of their own negative and destructive potential. Through this they reach the top of subconscious self-confusion. The shadow is hiding from itself by destroying the projected image of its own evil within the wrongs of the other, through which it is convincing itself from the “wrong” solution. For it is always human struggle that is yearning for freedom and completeness while being held captive within the chains of matter and it is mostly ending up in a condition of deep imbalance which is generally called “hell” by our religious tradition.

Still, these models are not only useful, they are also the only way to counter our subjective blindness at least with an objective short-sightedness, and that is not only the first but also the most important step on the path of wisdom. We can only analyse ourselves through the intellect but because we can only see the world the way we experience it through thinking we have to become an image of our thinking first of all – and for this we need models. Basically models are for binding our thoughts to a focus, so that we can have a common basis when we communicate with others and philosophize with them. If we were smart we would realize that the truth can not be enforced through thinking because the only thing that can be seen through thinking is thinking itself, in a way that what we have chosen to be the measure for itself. If we can keep that in mind we can use the models to explore our psyche, but not through realizing the truth but through becoming conscious about the individual way we are fixed to models. And how we adapt ourselves to the collective description of the world – we have no other choice.

Self-destructive acting as a way to reach development

Let us summarize this: Being a human being we are a form of existence that can only grow through painful experiences and a generous spirit has gifted us with the ability to grow regardless of how painful the loss or how big the catastrophe is. Only if a malicious daemon would persuade us to find out about the real material and spiritual fundament that we stand upon. All would collapse as we grovel in the collective madness of virtual shit. We are so helplessly interwoven with our models and structures that we would go down with them if we questioned them, that is why we don’t accept any questioning of our concept. We are forced to lie in order to keep everything functioning. We have to pretend that we don’t know anything about this so that our engine wouldn’t start stammering. The best thing about human development is the fact that the sceneries will always balance. That is why even self destruction is seen from the point of view of eternity not only a failure but also an advance for mankind.

Conversations with the old Magician
The Relativity of our Models
a) General questions concerning our worldview

How would you define magic or the deeper meaning of life? The aim that is important for the spiritual maturity of mankind?

In my opinion magic is the attempt to break through the borders with which our collectively integrated vision of the world has burdened us. The deeper meaning in life is to analyze the preconditions for the force that constrains us to constantly remain captured within the borders of our consciousness. In a word: The main concern is to overcome reality in order to, at least, loosen the blinkers that demarcate the perspective through which we see the reality we have been „fed“.

To overcome reality? What does „reality“mean seen from a magical point of view?

Reality is a double-edged sword: On the one hand it is a necessary tool that, more or less, preserves a harmonic interaction between human beings, on the other it is a kind of prison, in which we hold ourselves captive reciprocatively. We created this prison by ourselves, in a sense, in order to set up the conditions for a system in which we can communicate and simultaneously protect ourselves from our fears and the irritations of our subconsciousness. One could also say: Reality is the first layer of a black forest cake, which we are going to talk about later, that contains the social inventory of our civilization. It is only a thin sugar-coating on the pyramid of human evolution, and without it, the instinctive nature of mankind would be brought back to light, anarchy or the privilege of the stronger, as is exemplified in the total breakdown of order when cities that are haunted by natural disasters like earthquakes or floods – portraying the fundament of the human construction plan.

So it is that what protects human society that simultaneously prevents the development of the individual?

Evolution is an instrument of general balance without mercy and doesn’t purchase the spiritual goal of the enlightened, but always the most direct solution for the development of everything in the plan of nature. For this reason one should not observe reality from the perspective of the individual, but from nations and races in their entirety.

And who is the creator of this reality?

We are, but, well, unaware of it! We have constructed our material conditions under the influence of our sensory perception preconditioning the frame of the image in which the outside world is illustrated – this is an ancient act of balance and development that continues endlessly. If we look at it the other way around it is also the self-made structure of the outside that influences our sensory perception – we recognize it inside our own graven images, that suddenly usurp a collective energy field and can be used by the old bondholders of power as well as the new rulers.

You mean the act of creating our reality was – so to speak – the forbearer of human magic?

Yes. Our ego is the materialization of what we think ourselves to be and reality is – if not the creation communal – then at least the collective preservation of a traditional culture, that we constantly assimilate to the spirit of time. We are not the makers of the universe, but we all are the creators of our own, personal world, that is inseparably connected to the collective world in the shape as was spoon-fed into our minds.

Is it not possible to escape this dual reality?

More or less, yes, for nothing that we do is carved in stone – procedures change constantly and yet again every change influences the specific action. Admittedly, there are very few that catch the train, because they don’t know where they should escape to – because they tied themselves to this reality for a lifetime and made it the foundation of their whole existence. They are going in circles, because they have not learned at which point to jump of the carrousel. The spiritually experimentative person can flee it though, if he learns to silence the inner dialogue by consciously emptying his mind, cut off the stream of thoughts, which forces him to perpetually perceive the world in the shape of the structures that were pressed into his consciousness – at least for the period of time he is in a condition of silent thoughts or inhabits other spheres of consciousness.

According to that, reality cannot be objective?

Reality is the most objective dimension of thought we are able to construct after our image. The growing person that observes the world through his not yet developed and educated senses quickly learns to assimilate the collective images of his ancestors in a way that he can draw from them the optimal number of advantages for his life.

If I understand you correctly the general doings of humanity are reduced to simply administrating their only reality imparted through education?

They are not only administrating it, they are also developing it, at least as far as the conditions of their feigned structures allow them to do so. Although the normal human being has very little possibilities to influence these collective mechanisms individually, because those collective streams are accompanied with such an intensive collective force that the pressure of its flood always pushes away everything that holds against it.

But what drives us? What is trying to reach itself within us, so our fate can fulfil itself?

At first sight it is our superstitious ambitions that urge us – but behind that there is a silent force that is always desirous to balance the inner disharmony that indwells us. It originates in our social models and familial structures that coined us in our childhood. We are not free at heart – all the aims we pursue in the outside world are a never-ending attempt to compensate the inner deficit through a specific action in the material world. But we have the chance to grow if we bravely move forward and realise the greater connections, shoulder responsibility, and know that the things we do are not always good, but the best possible seen from the individual point of view.

What about our social ambitions? Are they wrong?

They are only wrong when we believe that they are right. Our social values mirror the game humanity plays and the fact that it invents certain rules in order to have something that they can occupy themselves with while living. Common morals are nothing but a collective self-occupation-therapy, so that human beings can perform their anarchistic nature on a controlled stage.

Why then all this stress, all this war and anxiety in the world?

Because our view is so narrow and dual. No one goes to war just fore the sake of war, no, we fight against each other, because the other one is always wrong and one is anxious to persuade the other one of the own justified demands. If it is necessary to enforce ones postulations, one has to use war, which of course never results from the own injustice, but from the unapologetic attitude of the other. The universal frequency is an impersonal force, neither good nor bad. Only the mechanisms of our consciousness paint them „black“ or „white“. The differentiation happens consequently in our central nervous system, in our thoughts. The former, negative descriptions of destructive forces mirror nothing else but the own, subconscious demons of mankind. The world is a mirror, in whose reflection we see the image of the others overlapped by our own demons, for which we are blind to recognize them ourselves.

Blind? But evil exists in this world – does it not?

Yes, but only because we do not know the deeper coherences of evil. Evil is mostly being constructed by numerous negative experiences, which in turn feed on personal disappointments. These disappointments result from negative experiences, from which we perceive only the mistakes of the others – not our own expectations.

Do you mean we can only see errors within the others?

Generally we do, yes.

That doesn’t sound very comforting! Where could be the solution?

We may not expect any solution to come from the outside, but we have to find it within ourselves. It is always most important to create ones own point of reference regardless of ones position, which is giving us the possibility to watch our actions from the outside point. Then we will realize very soon that a solution is not necessarily needed.

Why don’t we need a solution?

Because we are always a part of the solution! The problem is only the shadow of the resulting realization: We always see from our own perspective, the point from which we create our problems ourselves, because seen through the eyes of eternity our problems do not even exist ...

... and where does the problem exist then?

Nowhere. Every mistake is nothing but the retrospective of a realization, and the sense of all this lies within the strength not to root oneself to the position of the mistake. In other words: Mistakes are only the nebulosity of material systems, that wouldn’t exist without points of reference. Seen from a spiritual point of view they are nothing but a direction sign to realizations, helping us to perceive the operating forces of evolution, that normally are not perceptible through material thinking.

You think that injustice will remain in this world as long as we are only able to see it in others and never within ourselves?

Yes. Only the one who knows his own shadow, knows who he really is. And only the one who knows himself can conceive what it means to evolve from within oneself. For we do not only walk the tight-rope over the abyss, we are also the crocodiles lingering in the bleary waters who eat the ones who lost their balance. At least until we recognize the fact that the sinners are one part of ourselves and the crocodiles resemble the other part of the same existence.

But what about world piece?

The quest for paradise must remain an unfulfilled longing otherwise the human race has no ambition for development.

What ...? Why can’t the human race develop in piece and harmony?

A static paradise doesn’t offer enough foundations for the human ego to evolve, and therefore peace is never possible. Humanity needs war with the prospect of piece or perpetual crisis that includes the hope for paradise, which of course may not fulfil itself, so that it can serve as fundamental motivation for development.

Well I don’t know ... this sounds really brutal. Somehow I miss the term “Freedom”? What about our own, free will?

We have the freedom to do exactly that what vibrates within the collective frequency of the actual collective energy field of time, in a manner of speaking to implement a socially imprinted image of freedom within contracted, personal possibilities. It is always about “doing what has to be done”, like even Goethe knew already before our time. If we fulfil this aspiration, we perceive what leads to a conceived image of freedom.

Where does the final destination beyond our social and material aims lie?

Our origins lie within the spirit of the universe, within the unknown, and we came here to evolve – to learn about the laws of change within matter – This is about learning in what way we influence our world – To create the conditions under which we can change our reality, so we can understand the way our intellect is working. Only then can we realize that we are the ones who have to change if we want to improve the world.