The propaganda, you are a person. Where is it from? Why does the Eurasian understanding of the personality of a warrior hero and a convinced prophet and citizen differ from the merchant’s desire? To please whom? The hero wants to win, and the merchant wants to please.
The merchant does not care who is in front of him, and his main desire is to sell his goods. Because of this, he will praise the freak like beautiful, the dullard that he is cool, the upstart that he is serious, and so on. If he buys a product, item, and clothing in a merchant shop, he will leave very satisfied with himself. And the seller will forget this “person”.
The European identity and human rights were born in the market, and the Eurasian hero and fighter in a fight, in the struggle.
That’s why there is such a discrepancy. But European flattery is certainly close to a weak person, but proud. Many traditional people are very susceptible to flattery. Just take them with your bare hands after a couple of compliments. The European personality is picked up for free and went for a walk. And not just like that, but in front of everyone. Therefore, the European personality has an element of show, ostentation, speculation, hypocrisy, and all that is not liked in the Eurasian one. Isn’t that why the vanguard of “personalities” are perverts, psychopaths, moral freaks, vagabonds who received free money (maybe oppositionists), and they went berserk? If a person is also paid for, what kind of person is it? We are not talking about all Europeans. Most of them are decent normal people. We’re talking about images. What do people of traditional culture notice first of all in modern Europe and emphasize these qualities?
Market modern “personalities,” of course, like people with money. This is not necessarily the oligarchs, but the oligarchs in the first place. Market personalities scold corrupt officials. But not because they stole, but because other people pay them for shouting and denouncing corrupt officials. Oligarchs, for example, pay their journalists, and they write all kinds of criticism on competitors. Opposition oligarchs use-dependent people to take risks of them and so on. In general, it does not matter where the money comes from, and it is important to expose and, if possible, on camera so that you can see that they are individuals. That’s why many people started taking their selfies because the more a person likes himself, the more he is your client. Total clogging of the selfie network is an infection of the personality virus. At the bazaar, for example, where all persons buy and sell. Empty people, it is known, loves themselves most of all and runs to where the empty people gather, empty of empty, but who is shown on the screen and say that this is a star. That’s why the stars of the screen and the stars, in general, have got mixed up with stellar empty liberals. For example, one well-known oppositionist slept with a minor, and he still has a good relationship and mutual friendship with his sponsor. (for the sponsors of any perversion – it is a fact that is more important than another fact). If uncles with money say that a person does things, it does not matter what value, and if this very person scolds the authorities – this is the most useful person.
In a geopolitical confrontation in this way through a corrupt person, ( oligarch?) the most important to finish off the Eurasian person like a prostitute. Anyone who is willing to sell out or give up in this way makes a conscious choice not out of conviction but out of the calculation.
The traditional people are child people. If you know the child, it is easy to direct them. The opposition says that the autocrat was lucky with the people. This is at first glance. Any Ulugbek Khan, leader Trotsky or President of the Kyrgyz people Akayev can lose the country and the people through the fault of the child. In fact, each of these intelligent leaders lost control of the people because they played the soft, wise rule. These are facts from history. Are the same Kazakhs at the level of the Soviet people of the 30s? And this is not a coincidence because such a coincidence is dangerous for everyone. All Central Asia consists of the traditional (Zerefs) peoples. Even the Soviet government met traditionally quietly, modestly, and not noticeably. Nothing has changed, and nothing has changed even now. Everything just went back to normal today – such a life such people have always had.
Simultaneously, millions of traditional Kazakh people from the villages rushed to the big cities-administrative centers, where mostly non-Kazakhs lived because the urban population was advanced (and newcomers looked them in the mouth, how all children look at their teachers at school). A new culture has always been formed in cities. Although, any person could then and today break out of the traditional village environment and move to the city. There, everyone can learn and become the same authority as your relatives. No one would hurt. That’s what cities are for so that students look into the mouths of teachers. And looking in the mouth is a culture of almost filial deference. All traditional people look in the mouth of all authorities and teachers. It depends on education and discipline.
Kazakhs were absorbed in urban life, Soviet urbanization, and now the market has literally swallowed them.
And the Kazakhs, who are accustomed to answering only to their kind (before the clan, but not before the state – A. B) learn to answer, while only to their families. If you are lucky, the steppe people are willing to invite you to their feasts in the past and now. The lucky respected Kazakhs invite everyone to visit; this is normal to show your high level. All traditional peoples have no other reason to invite guests. This is the culture. It’s a tradition to invite guests. One doesn’t interfere with the other.
Finally, former nomads are afraid to lose, and even they do not know what. For example, competition with their relatives, neighbors, just familiar people. The child is also afraid of getting lost. That is why many Kazakh Muslims say Shukur all the time; they do not look for good from the good. So we’re good, and we say Alla Shukur!
This is still the level of prohibitions or the very first level of taboos.
Not losing face is like not losing sheep. This is such a loss. That is why the steppe people in the past are not accustomed to any other type of responsibility, except for responding to their relatives and now just acquaintances. But don’t show yourself to the rams and don’t show your status to the rams? (although, of course, this “responsibility” to friends and relatives is more like a show-off, show-offs in modern terms). So, why doesn’t Yelbasy (or Putin in the North), who is lucky with the people (the people who are afraid of losing a non-essential show-off or don’t know what), rein in their corrupt officials, or rather servants? After all, all corrupt officials are officials of their system. Do not forget that Stalin led a policy based on state ownership, and Elbasy managed the Kazakh market after the General privatization. It’s easier for him.
If the people are a child, then the people of the child must have a father.
Or the father of the people, Elbasy is the greatest authority for them. Cult and fame do not arise from scratch. The same phenomenon has been and will continue to be the case for all non-urbanized traditional peoples who are afraid of losing any crumbs that fate and history have measured out.
Corrupt officials as market participants.
And no one is rushing to repress anyone because market aggregates are somewhat different from the motives that guided Stalin. For the market needs of the market actors. In order for the market to function even in the form of a demonstration or global show-offs, market participants are needed, which means that corrupt officials are also needed as subjects. So Elbasy can take away everything from competitors if he wants to, of course (In this sense, it is much more difficult for Putin). Or maybe he will try again to raise young people around him? But then he would be alone.
The traditional world can’t live without corruption?
And in this very market, the subjects of corruption feel great. The answer is simple because the basis of tradition is family. A traditional person thinks about the family. This is the will or law of the ancestors. There’s no getting away from it.
Who is our support in this swaying world?
Why only officials and pensioners are invited to local studios and TV shows.
Old people talk with a gasp and foam at the mouth about the greatness of the old times. So sweet that the viewer believes they lived there. Officials continue making excuses and are accountable. Some tongue-tied political scientists talk nonsense with a smart look. They also invite so-called local politicians… What else?
Channels would love to see a bigger fish. But the unspoken status, the traditional agreement ahead of the father not to climb into hell, leaves for joy a meeting exclusively with small fish. Officials come to the Studio as very frightened people who would not come here at all, but they must somehow portray unity with the people, time obliges, but rather the authorities force. Only an emergency of any scale guarantees the appearance of a big official by the standards of the system. This is a responsible person who should be responsible for the entire system. This official is responsible for his area of work. If he doesn't give an answer, it will be the end of his career.
But even very young faces were appearing among the Ministers. They also always seem to be scared and clamped down on something. But with talkative pensioners (aksakals) Kazakh channels were lucky. These pensioners are happy to come to light. And for what? To show yourself in the frontal place and not your knowledge at all. The more is often shown, the more authority they have. The list of registered political scientists is also narrow. But most of all, the so-called politicians smell acid. In the sense of saying the same thing for a long time and not trying to come up with something, but every time it still turns out that something went sour right in the Studio, and this person did not come only yesterday, although he came all the time or walked around the microphone for fifteen years. The same lecturers and speakers, officials, and artists. These people have passed the loyalty test, and therefore they almost live in these studios like at home.
Things aren't moving.
But is this the main thing? There can be no other in about two camps or subjects of activity as the conditional elite and conditional ordinary people. And only the presence of the elite and the rabble well shows the reason for such an eternal two-color cart. Even the same notorious Shukur, that are accused the people the presumptuous activists of Western freedoms and Western democracy, is only explained by this. Only, the question is, where did they come from? People of a different color of mind?
We come close to the question of where the marginals came from. And not in the sense of marginals like Russophiles ("vata") or great-power Imperials. But where did the steppe Democrats come from? When people of a great tradition should be divided into two camps – the elite and subordinates. Forever and ever. Not when the clock of eternity is ticking but constantly.
So, we came to people who appear, excite the crowd, exciting hopes, and quickly disappear like the same celestial meteors. Only from the meteors of heaven, a certain bright light pours. And from searchlights and scammers, otherwise, our stars cannot be called, only glare for five minutes. Why do they appear in the general pile of conditional provocateurs? Why do they break the inertia of the herd of conditional rams when no one allowed them to graze someone? In general, all traditional people believe that if someone came out into the open and shouted a message, then this person is at work. He was required to go out and tell people the news. And today, when one of the incentives is money, someone hired criers on their behalf, the money was taken, and they need to work out. We need to focus on this point. The mass of the people may be stupid. But at such a moment, everyone is a wise man because everyone judges by himself. And the average worldly wisdom says: do not twitch if you are not given an order. The second part is from humility to calling the boss: do not do anything, but do as everyone does and generally blend in with the crowd so that the wolf does not eat you, be in the center, not on edge. So, we find Shukur man together.
Be content with little and be silent.
The traditional man in his matrix is always content with little. Otherwise, he will be reprimanded. Consistently from the father, brothers, relatives, uncle, family, in General, the clan society, he will be convicted and even punished. Otherwise, he is not a traditional person. If you do something when no one gives permission, it is to make a challenge, consistently to the father, brothers, uncle, and so on.
So, in this general Shukur fall and officials of all ranks, and politicians that are sour and conditional sour milk, and political scientists, and journalists, in general, everyone who was chosen by the system of father and brothers. Conditional, of course, father and brothers. But the system is accurate. But the very fact that someone appears playing of such a tribe means that they are authorized by a higher brother or relatives (that is, officials). These people are the same shukur as calm peaceful, super peaceful even (in the opinion of marginal upstarts) from the ordinary crowd. Official people are official Shukur. The people who are not official, who no one authorizes, are the Shukur people. This is a traditional people. What about our meteorites?
Where to put the upstart meteors?
And why do they suddenly disappear on the highest note of their cry?
Well, first, as we just found out, no one screams for no reason here. If a screaming man is a massive head, you might say the only big man may shout. If someone shouts, and he’s not the boss, this person quickly runs away after shouting. He will worry again for the money and authorize him to shout George Soros’s philanthropist. Here, meteorites are closer to the market discourse.
In a situation of two camps, two subjects, two colors, the elite, and the grassroots, may appear to the people who have lost their place. These are also traditional people because only the steppe people disappear after a sudden departure without an invitation to the podium. Still, they want to be the elite very much, so they climb the podium. They are infantile, and the passions of fame devour. But since they still have a father and brothers, they disappear of their accord, rather understand that they’re nobody here anymore – the rabble. But for the moment that they had or the short time that their passion aroused them, they wanted to feel like the elite, and they did. From now on, they are marginalized. Now they are slaves not to their brothers but to their passion. These caliphs of local politics are very poorly prepared for a one-time exit. They’re really not ready. Their speech is poor, and their thoughts are poor. But going out uninvited in such a shukur setting is a feat: sensation, emergency. Only passion and knowledge turn them into marginals. These are the kind of people, laymen, who fill the official airwaves. And as politicians, these people are funny, not serious at all. Rather, they imitate someone.
But they, we know, will immediately disappear, who appeared out of nowhere. And losers called their exit politics. This exit is more of a marginal position than opposition to the government. It is oppositional only by an extraordinary turn. All those who are outside Shukur are marginals, not oppositionists. If they were oppositionists, they would be prepared. From year to year, they would prepare, prepared seriously. And what do we see? This is a game of emotions or just populism. What else can you expect from former villagers? For the support of a desperate crowd? It is more like a display advertising effect. In the steppe, never followed by ordinary people, only feudal lords led.
If meteorite politicians don’t belong to the elite, then they are closer to the people? In any case, here, Shukur really rests on the people. On the traditions of the people. On paternalism. But we know that all those who are not conditionally included in the elite are looking for and finding not justice, not freedom, not truth. All traditional people don’t need these categories. Everything that does not feed the family that does not feed the relatives, about all the relatives I do not say, is not significant. Justice, freedom, and truth are all important to the marginalized. Traditional people are in the eternal search of a patron. This patron will do as each Shukur wants with his Shukur. ( Shukur this is such a mood of goodness from Muslim ethics, finding minimum for necessary contentment)
But what was the response?
The meteors that appeared with their meager speech, weak energy, and clichéd words gave hope for a new world, the dream of the new patron to folk. Even down among the common people, in other words, there is a fierce struggle and squeezing out the weak. In a traditional environment, this is the case everywhere. The market only increased the cruelty of natural people. There is no natural sentimentality here. Meteors appeared, screamed, threw glare, and ran to them outcasts who have not еру patrons, or they had weak patrons. They lost out on the market for the natural cruelty of traditional folk. But they want to take revenge on the elite. At the same steppe people, but successful, with a successful roof, a successful business, with a successful all-powerful patron.
What did they say?
Do we deserve to live in different conditions? Do we have all the possibilities for this? That only a handful of corrupt officials live well here. It means they say that about the president's people. This camarilla gathered around the feeder, led by the main Shukur?
What else can they say? Except for these stamps words. What system? What is the path to this system? I assure you, they don’t know it themselves. They don’t know where they’re really going. Because in the state of two camps, two subjects, two colors, they must be either there or there. And these upstarts only want to be elite, and they prefer not to be ordinary people. And the crowd, accustomed to two camps, subjectivity from the elite to conditional the rabble, sees in them only patrons see the roof, but not the rulers in fact.
But what am I talking about? They disappeared quickly – they are disappearing. It always happens with all upstarts. They are out of shukura’s game. Because Shukur is our ancient steppe, reliable ideology, whoever sticks to it will not lose.
Glossary
GLOSSARY
The Zeref- a traditional person with rigidly set social actions, low reflection almost zero, hence the word zeref-reflection zero (zeref).). Has no semitones, serves the idols of the genus, communicates in the circle of native blood. Zeref has no semitones of perception, is categorical, irreconcilable, hostile to others and to another opinion in the development of rejection of “not your own”
It is known that the market economy comes out of the crisis healthier, adapted to the new challenge. Outdated technologies and wrong firms will go bankrupt, and in their place will come more technological and advanced. No private owner will keep a loss-making enterprise. He will ruin it, create something new in a new place. These are the laws of the market that oblige and dictate. What's on the other end?
We see familiar faces and optional businesses led by the same executives at the other end. If you look at the accompaniment, the old editors keep the old journalists and tell the old stories. Similarly, analysts broadcast crude Analytics; political scientists continue a rotten lecture, philosophers philosophize duets about the beauty and grandeur, of course, local antiquity. It may be the other way around, of course, that ancient officials or old editors call for a new generation, and then very young ministers and young journalists appear. But they will also shukurs. Despite their youth. In fact, in paternalism, the older brother always has, making the younger ones work. And the younger ones, knowing that they are the younger ones, will do the same as the older brothers before them. But it will be the same wearing old clothes of the elders, which was in many children of Soviet families.
In the same way, young officials and their young staff will carry on the old fate of senior officials. And the traditional system will take and select for itself not just anyone, not people from the street, even if they are young, to make this youth an advertisement for progress, and show the docile and docile people, smiling and submissive. Even better, if they are direct sons or nephews, or other young people from relatives. It looks from the outside like family contracts from top to bottom of the state family. That’s right!
A traditional state.
If it is based on conservatism and the people’s customs, it must be a family. And in this family, there is a father and there are brothers and uncles. This is how the older ones select the younger ones. If the company or firm is large and there are few relatives, managers, and officials, the official selects a loyal contingent. Where are the most loyal and traditional people? Of course – in the provinces. In villages and auls, the recruitment of “young people” is going at the fastest pace. The firm and the state are not waiting for. Thus, the selection criteria for positions are completely unprofessional and not even economically logical. After all, many relatives will not do anything but will wait for payday. After all, they are also elite like their uncles. If the uncle refuses the services of relatives for this reason, then he recruits helpful and hard-working relatives. Any conditional junior in the conservative system and firm tradition is a silent pack donkey. No matter, a young Minister can also be a conditional donkey. If there are many young Ministers, it means that the company’s elder has a lot of work to do. And the young can be well run over, and they will be silent. But more senior Ministers, if they have saved up money, can go into opposition from resentment. Here, the opposition gathers just those who have become rich and forgotten their place in the ranks. But that at first, they all mowed down under the younger ones, there is no doubt. In such a system, a family firm is recruited just for full loyalty. Everyone agrees to be donkeys for-profit and family interests.
This is how the management staff is recruited at all levels. This is how marketing agents are recruited in the local market. Although marketing agents still need professional skills, they are not any agents but freeloaders. Well, in general, more or less young people are going to administrative positions after their former colleagues. But they are recruited, once again, from the province and are selected from the pile of applicants for clear features and suitability, namely for a distinct complaisance and a smile (although it is not necessary to smile, it gives out that it is necessary). Who should not lead at all ( the timidity and shyness get priorities)?
If you fall into the group of potential akims (officials). Never mind, you'll learn to lead people after a while. There is a kind of anti-evolutionary choice. The one who can't do any harm, challenge openly, compete professionally, what is the best. Although in a quiet pool, something is found. But it is not for nothing that Eastern politics is conducted not in the light but at night and under the carpet.
Similarly, the habit of speaking openly is a sign of degeneration. These are anti-conservative elements. Nomad will never speak openly, just as the Ministry's employees will never compete openly. By profession, by skills. But to unseat each other as sukurs and all kinds of wizards. As if the brothers were telling their father in his ear that their brother was doing something bad, the father would not hesitate to punish this unfortunate of all the brothers. So all the people carefully selected for specific qualities gossip about each other to take the right place, which will be released after the wrath of their boss.
And if we talk about the existence of two pillars of subjectivity in the conservative world – the elite and the common people, there is a void between them, and there is nothing. There shouldn’t be anything at all. Anyone who falls in the middle between two specific camps is an outcast, an outsider, and doesn’t play the game. This means that the absence of opposition in the sense that is usually understood by fashion is easily explained by this emptiness. Either you’re loyal, or you’re nobody. If you are loyal, all paths are open for you in this world. It depends on which, of course, the path. And the paths are not for everyone. But the people, the common people, support this cultural paradigm according to a flaw hidden from prying eyes. The conservative people support Shukur, do not support it, but live by Shukur because this is the only reliable and proven way to grow from a younger brother to an older one and grow up to be a senior to maintain order with the young growing behind. There is a void between the elite and the conventional mob. But it is filled exclusively with obedience.
This is why the feudal government is so insensitive to requests, pleas, complaints, and appeals from citizens that it is necessary to do something quickly so that there is no revolt, coup, or revolution. They, of course, heard these words, studied in schools and further. But traditional people would not be traditional if they filled the moat between themselves and others with something that communicates. If they are sensitive and over-sensitive, other traditional people will see this as a weakness. So, it was, so it is. The most effective managers in the East are tyrants. They maintain order. That’s why this castle, where the elite lived, is very separate and defiantly inaccessible. The traditional elite must emphasize its inaccessibility, including thick skin and weak ears.
Ücretsiz ön izlemeyi tamamladınız.