Kitabı oku: «Solar system / Alternative theories», sayfa 11
Not only our Moon, but also other the moons of the SS have signs of artificial influencing. For example, Triton, the satellite of Neptune, has large "lakes" with terraces on the banks with a step height of up to a kilometer, near the equator on the side facing to Neptune. Another example is Jupiter satellite Ganymede, like the Moon, has a strong destruction on the side facing the planet. The other example can be Miranda, a satellite of Uranus. It seems, that someone "drew on its surface". It has the giant areas, consisting of parallel bands and almost right angles on it. They can not be explained by natural causes. It can be assumed, that they were created not by something, but by somebody. All this serves as proof of the artificial getting of the moons into the orbits.
There are many moons in the SS especially in the gas planets. If this hypothesis is correct, then developed civilizations were formerly on gas giants, before they were destroyed, because someone put their moons into orbits. This theory does not apply to other satellites of non-planetary type. In my opinion, they belong to the SS and have emerged together with it. If we look at Table 4, then many satellites of a non-planetary type can be seen near the gas planets. They have different orbital characteristics, forward and reverse rotation, different orbit inclinations. There is a probability, that a second satellite will arise at the Earth. However, nowadays there are no organized observations of the near-Earth space and also there is no technical capability to prevent collisions and to bring falling celestial bodies into near-earth orbits.
For the sake of objectivity, it should be noted, that the moons of the dwarf planets of the Kuiper belt do not fit into this theory. It is unlikely, that life and developed civilizations could exist so far from the Sun and on such small planets. Therefore, it is not clear how the satellites appeared at the trans-Neptunian planets.
6. Macro and micro
From the school course, everyone has heard of the analogy between the structure of atoms and stellar system. It is said, that structure of atoms has a planetary model. It is interesting to consider the space from the point of view of the micro world. Then every stellar system is an analog of the atom of some substance. Stellar systems can be interconnected, like the bonds of atoms within molecules. Spiral galaxies can be analogues of spiral molecules DNA, RNA, characteristic of living organisms.
We know little about other stars. Our SS is already well studied. Let's take it for comparison with the micro world. The basis of each atom is a positively charged core. In space, the stars matches this concept. In our system it is the Sun. Electrons in atoms are distributed over energy levels in a certain pattern. The maximum number of electrons on the level: 2s-for all starting from the 1st level, 6p-from – the 2nd, 10d-from – the 3rd, 14f-from – the 4th, 18g-from – the 5th, 22h- from – the 6th. The basis of each level is s-shaped electrons, which have a spherical shape and trajectories close to circular.
In macrocosm, the planets can be considered as analogues of s-electrons. The p-type electrons have a shape of 8 and 8-shaped trajectory. Perhaps, the comets are analogues of them in the macrocosm. Comet Hartley-2 has a pronounced form of 8. This can be seen in the photo taken by the Deep probe in 2005. The SS, beginning from the Jupiter, has a large number of natural satellites with different orbital characteristics: permanent and not constant orbits, with forward and reverse rotation, with different eccentricities and inclination of orbits. Perhaps, by some of these properties they can be attributed to d, f, g or h type. Our SS is very old and heavily destroyed, so it is almost impossible to classify.
A sufficiently definite analogy is traced only between s-electrons and planets. There can be no more than 2 of them on each energy level. Based on this, the number of energy levels in the SS can be determined. In the Table 1 (part 2) the similarity in size of the neighbour planets is clearly visible. Presumably, the planets on neighbour orbits, similar in size, belong to the one energy level. However, in this case Mercury is without a pair. A small hypothetical planet Lara, of Mercury size, could be on orbit ~36 million km, but it is absent. May be it was shattered. In this case Lara+Mercury belong to the 1st energy level, Venus+Earth – to the 2nd, Mars+Phaeton – to the 3rd, Jupiter+Saturn – to 4th, Uranus+Neptune – to the 5th, Pluto+Eris – to the 6th level.
Another assumption is, that the planets of one energy level can have different sizes. In this case Mercury+Venus belong to the 1st level, Earth+Mars – to the 2nd, Phaeton+Jupiter – to the 3rd, Saturn+Uranus – to the 4th, Pluto+Eris – to the 5th. Officially it is accepted to consider, that asteroids belt has always existed – it has never been a planet. However, it is not so. The orbits of planets are determined by the Titsiusa-Bode formula as R=0.4+0.3*2i, where i – is a number of a planet. By this formula a planet must be in the asteroids belt orbit. Ceres, the moon of Phaeton, has been found, because the scientists were looking for the alleged planet in this orbit. The Neptune does't correspond to this formula. Presumably, it "has come" from the space.
