Kitabı oku: «Studies in the Theory of Descent, Volume II», sayfa 7
APPENDIX II
The following paper by Dr. Fritz Müller52 forms the third of a series of communications on Brazilian butterflies published in “Kosmos,” and as it bears upon the investigations made known in the third essay of the present work, I will here give a translation, by permission of the publisher, Herr Karl Alberts.
“Acræa and the Maracujá Butterflies as Larvæ, Pupæ, and Imagines
“In a thoughtful essay on ‘Phyletic Parallelism in Metamorphic Species,’ Weismann has shown that in the case of Lepidoptera the developmental stages of larva, pupa, and imago vary independently, and that a change occurring in one stage is without influence upon the preceding and succeeding stages, so that the course which has been followed by the individual stages in their developmental history has not been in all cases identical. This want of agreement may manifest itself both by unequal divergence of form-relationship, and by unequal group formation. With respect to unequal form-divergence the caterpillars are sometimes more closely related in form than their imagines, and at other times the reverse is the case. With respect to unequal group formation again, two cases are possible; the larvæ and imagines may form groups of unequal value, the one stage forming higher or lower groups than the other, or they may form groups of unequal size, i. e., groups which do not coincide but which overlap. Form-relationship and blood-relationship do not therefore always agree; the resemblances among the caterpillars would lead to a quite different arrangement to that resulting from the resemblances among the imagines, and it is probable that neither of these arrangements would correspond with the actual relationships.
“Starting from this fact, which he establishes by numerous examples, Weismann proceeds to show most convincingly that an innate power of development or of transformation, such as has been assumed under various names by many adherents of the development theory, has no existence, but that every modification and advancement in species has been called forth by external influences.
“A most beautiful illustration of the want of ‘phyletic parallelism,’ as Weismann designates the different form-relationships of the larvæ, pupæ, and imagines, is furnished by the five genera Acræa, Heliconius, Eueides, Colænis, and Dione (= Agraulis). This instance seems to me to be of especial value, because it offers the rare case of pupæ showing greater differences than the larvæ and imagines.
“The species of which I observed the larvæ and pupæ are Acræa Thalia and Alalia, Heliconius Eucrate, Eueides Isabella, Colænis Dido and Julia, Dione Vanillæ and Juno; besides these I noticed the pupa of Eueides Aliphera.
“The following remarks apply only to these species, although we may suppose with great probability that the whole of the congeneric forms – excepting perhaps the widely ranging species of Acræa– would display similar characters to their Brazilian representatives.
“The imagines of the five genera mentioned form two sharply defined families, the Acræidæ and the butterflies of the Maracujá group.53 The latter comprises the three genera Heliconius, Eueides, and Colænis, which differ only in very unimportant characters; Eueides is distinguished from Heliconius by its shorter antennæ, and Colænis differs from Eueides in having the discoidal cell of the hind-wings open. The genus Dione is further removed by the different structure of the legs, and the silvery spots on the underside of the wings. Certain species resemble those of other genera in a most striking manner, and much more closely both in colour and marking, and even in the form of their wings, than they do their own congeners. This is the case with Acræa Thalia and Eueides Pavana, with Heliconius Eucrate and Eueides Isabella, and with Eueides Aliphera and Colænis Julia, which are deceptively alike, and the last two are connected with Dione Juno, at least by the upper side of the wings. The difficulty of judging of the relationships of the single species is thus much aggravated; it cannot be said how much of this resemblance is to be attributed to blood-relationship, and how much to deceptive imitation.
“As larvæ all the Brazilian species must be placed in one genus, as they agree exactly in the number and arrangement of their spines (4 spines, not in a transverse row, on segments 2 and 3; 6 spines, in a transverse row, on segments 4–11; 4 spines, not in a transverse row, on the last (12th) segment). They differ from one another much less in this respect than do the German species of Vanessa, such, for instance, as V. Io or Antiopa from V. Polychloros, Urticæ, and Atalanta.54 The larvæ of Acræa Thalia are certainly without the two spines on the head which the others possess, and, on the other hand, they have a well-developed pair of spines on the first segment, which, in most of the other species, are completely absent; but this does not justify their separation, since the head spines of Heliconius, Eueides, and Colænis Dido, which are of a considerable length, are shorter than those of the next segment in Colænis Julia, and Dione Vanillæ, and in Dione Juno they dwindle down to two minute points, this last species also bearing a short pair on the first segment. The larva of Dione Juno is thus as closely related to that of Acræa Thalia as it is to that of its congener Dione Vanillæ.
“If it were desired to form two distinct larval groups this could not be effected on the basis of their differences in form, but could only be based on their food-plants. The larvæ of Heliconius, Eueides, Colænis, and Dione live on species of Maracujá (Passiflora); those of Acræa Thalia and Alalia on Compositæ (Mikania and Veronia). These larval groups would agree with those founded on the form-relationships of the imagines, but unlike the imaginal groups, which can be formed into families, they would scarcely possess a generic value.
“If we arrange the single species of caterpillars according to their resemblances, this arrangement does not agree with that based on the resemblances of the imagines, even if we disregard the different values of the groups. The result is somewhat as follows: —
[Here follow the remarks on the habits of the larvæ in connection with their colours, &c., which have already been quoted in illustration of the use of the spiny protection (note 133, p. 293). From these facts the author draws the conclusion that the form-relationships of the caterpillars depend rather upon their mode of life than upon their blood-relationships, assuming the latter to be correctly expressed by the arrangement of the imagines at present adopted.]
Figs. 1–4. Pupæ of Acræa Thalia; Heliconius Eucrate; Eueides Isabella, and Colænis Dido; life size.
“A glance at the above figures of the pupæ of Heliconius Eucrate (Fig. 2), Eueides Isabella (Fig. 3), and Colænis Dido (Fig. 4), will show how great are the differences between these pupæ as compared with the close form-relationship of all the Maracujá butterflies, and with the no less close resemblance of their larvæ. A family which comprised three such dissimilar pupæ would also be capable of including that of Acræa Thalia (Fig. 1).
“The pupa of this last species has nothing peculiar in its general appearance, but possesses the ordinary pupal form; it is tolerably rounded, without any great elevations or depressions; a minute pointed projection is situated on the head over each eye-cover, and a similar process projects from the roots of the wings. Its distinguishing characters are five pairs of spines on the back of the abdominal segments. These spines are found also in Acræa Alalia, but appear to be absent in other species, e. g. in the Indian A. Violæ. Last summer, among some batches of Thalia larvæ – each batch being the progeny from one lot of eggs – I found certain individuals which differed from the others in having much shorter spines, and these changed into pupæ in which the five pairs of spines were proportionally shorter than usual, thus being an exception to the rule that changes in one stage of development are without influence on the other stages. I may remark, by the way, that this law, enunciated by Weismann, can only be applied to imagines and pupæ with certain restrictions. The skin of the pupa forms a sheath or cover for the eyes, antennæ, trunk, legs, and wings of the imago, and if these parts undergo any considerable modification in the latter, corresponding changes must appear in the pupa. This is shown, for instance, by many ‘Skippers’ (Hesperidæ), in which the extraordinarily long trunk necessitates a sheath of a corresponding length. The colour of the pupa of Acræa Thalia is whitish, the wing-veins with some other markings and the spines are black; metallic spots are absent.
“In the pupa of Heliconius Eucrate the laterally compressed region of the wings is raised into a large projection, the antennal sheaths lying on the edges of the wings are serrated and beset with short pointed spines; instead of the minute projections of Acræa Thalia, the head bears two large humped processes; the body is raised on each side into a foliaceous border carrying five spines of different lengths, the foremost pair, directed towards the head, being the longest. The pupa is brown, and ornamented with four pairs of brilliant metallic spots, one pair close behind the antennæ, and three pairs, almost coalescent, on the back before the longest pair of spines. A short spine projects from the middle of each of the latter somewhat arched metallic patches.
“In the pupa of Colænis Dido (which resembles that of Colænis Julia, and to which may be added those of Dione Vanillæ and Juno) the spines are absent, the wing region is but moderately arched, and the antennæ marked only by small elevations; instead of the leaf-like border, there are on each side of the back five knotty or humped processes. The metallic spots are similar in number and position to those of Heliconius Eucrate; those on the back have a wart-like process in the middle, instead of a spine.
“The pupæ of Heliconius and Colænis when moving their posterior segments rapidly, as they do whenever they are disturbed, produce a very perceptible hissing noise by the friction of these segments, this sound, which is especially noticeable in the case of Heliconius Eucrate, perhaps serving to terrify small foes. (So loud is the sound produced in this manner by the pupæ of Epicalia Numilia, that my children have named them ‘Schreipuppen.’)
“The pupæ of Heliconius and Colænis thus differ to a much greater extent than the imagines or larvæ, and the same holds good for Eueides in a much higher degree as compared with its above-mentioned allies. The larvæ of Eueides have no distinctive characters, and even the generic rank of the imagines is doubtful; as pupæ, on the other hand, they are far removed (even by their mode of suspension) not only from the remainder of the Maracujá group and from the whole of the great Nymphalideous group (Danainæ, Satyrinæ, Elymniinæ, Brassolinæ, Morphinæ, Acræinæ and Nymphalinæ), but from almost all other butterflies. The larva pupates on the underside of a leaf; the pupa is fastened by the tail, but does not hang down like the pupæ of the other Nymphalidæ, – its last segments are so curved that the breast of the chrysalis is in contact with the underside of the leaf. I am not acquainted with any other pupa among those not suspended by a girdle which assumes such a position. Something similar occurs, however, in the pupa of Stalachtis, which is without a girdle, and according to Bates, is ‘kept in an inclined position by the fastening of the tail.’ By this peculiarity Bates distinguishes the Stalachtinæ from the Libytheæ with pupæ ‘freely suspended by the tail.’
“Besides through this peculiar position of the body, the pupa of Eueides Isabella is distinguished by short hooked and long narrow sabre-like pairs of processes on the back and head. Its colour is whitish, yellowish, or sordid yellowish-grey; in the last variety both the four long dorsal processes and the surrounding portions, as well as the points of the other processes, remain white or yellowish. The pupa Eueides Aliphera is very similar, only all the processes are somewhat shorter, the four longest (dorsal) and some other markings being black.
“Now if, as Weismann has attempted to show for larvæ and imagines, the form-divergence always ‘corresponds exactly with the divergence in the mode of life,’ the question arises as to what difference in the conditions of life has brought about such a considerable form-divergence between the pupæ of such closely allied species as the Maracujá butterflies. In pupæ which do not eat or drink, and which have neither to seek in courtship nor to care for progeny, it is only protection from foes that can concern us. But in the pupæ of nearly allied species of which the larvæ feed on kindred plants in the same districts at the same periods of the year, can the enemies be so different as to produce such a considerable divergence in form? One might answer this question in the negative with some confidence, and affirm that in this case the difference in the pupæ does not result from the ‘divergence in the mode of life,’ or from the difference in the external conditions, but is accidental, i. e. a consequence of some fortunate variation induced by some external cause, which variation afforded protection against common foes – to one species in one way, and to the other species in some other way; this course, once entered upon, having been urged on by natural selection, until at length the wide divergence now shown is attained. How in the case of any of the species the peculiarity in colour or form can actually serve as a protection, I must confess myself at fault in answering. Only in the case of the pupa of Eueides Isabella will I venture to offer a supposition. That it is not green like other pupæ which suspend themselves among foliage (Siderone, Epicalia, Callidryas, &c.), but contrasts more or less brightly with the dark green of the leaves, precludes the idea of concealment; on the other hand its colour is too dull to serve as a conspicuous sign of distastefulness. In either case the meaning of the wonderful processes of the pupa would remain unexplained.
“We are thus compelled to seek another possibility in mimicry, by which foes would be deceived by deceptive resemblance. But what is the object imitated? Dead insects overgrown by fungi are often found on leaves, the whitish or yellowish fungi growing from their bodies in various fantastic forms. Such insects of course no longer serve as tempting morsels. The processes of the pupa of Eueides suggest such fungoid growths, although I certainly cannot assert that to our eyes in broad daylight the resemblance is very striking. But the pupæ hang among the shadows of the leaves, and a less perfect imitation may deceive foes that are not so sharp-sighted; protective resemblance must commence moreover with an imperfect degree of imitation.”
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES
Plate III
Figs. 1–12 represent larvæ of Macroglossa Stellatarum, all bred from one batch of eggs. Most of the figures are enlarged, but sometimes to a very small extent only; the lines show the natural length.
Fig. 1. Stage I.; a caterpillar immediately after hatching. Natural length, 0.2 centim.
Fig. 2. Stage II.; shortly after the first moult. Natural length, 0.7 centim.
Figs. 3–12. Stage V.; the chief colour-varieties.
Fig. 3. The only lilac-coloured specimen in the whole brood. Natural length, 3.8 centim.
Fig. 4. Light-green form (rare) with subdorsal shading off beneath.
Fig. 5. Green form (rare) with strongly-pronounced dark markings (dorsal and subdorsal lines). Natural length, 4.9 centim.
Fig. 6. Dark-brown form (common). Natural length, 4 centim. In this figure the fine shagreening of the skin is indicated by white dots; in the other figures these are partially or entirely omitted, being represented only in Figs. 8 and 10.
Fig. 7. Light-green form (common). Natural length, 4 centim.
Fig. 8. Light-brown form (common). Natural length, 3.5 centim.
Plate III.
Aug. Weismann pinx.
Lith. J. A. Hofmann, Würzburg.
Plate IV.
Aug. Weismann pinx.
Lith. J. A. Hofmann, Würzburg.
Plate V.
Aug. Weismann pinx.
Lith. J. A. Hofmann, Würzburg.
Plate VI.
Aug. Weismann pinx.
Lith. J. A. Hofmann, Würzburg.
Fig. 9. Parti-coloured specimen, the only one out of the whole brood. Natural length, 5.5 centim.
Fig. 10. Grey-brown form (rare).
Fig. 11. One of the forms intermediate between the dark-brown and green varieties, dorsal aspect.
Fig. 12. Light-green form with very feeble dorsal line (shown too strongly in the figure), dorsal aspect.
Figs. 13–15. Deilephila Vespertilio.
Fig. 13. Stage III.(?); the subdorsal bearing yellow spots. Natural length, 1.5 centim.
Fig. 14. Stage IV.; the subdorsal interrupted throughout by complete ring-spots, the white “mirrors” of which are bordered with black, and contain in their centres a reddish nucleus. Natural length, 3 centim.
Fig. 15. Stage V.; shortly after the fourth moult. Subdorsal line completely vanished; ring-spots somewhat irregular, with broad black borders; natural length, 3.5 centim.
Fig. 16. Sphinx Convolvuli, Stage V., brown form. Subdorsal line retained on segments 1–3, on the other segments present only in small remnants; at the points where the (imaginary) subdorsal crosses the oblique stripes there are large bright spots; natural length, 7.8 centim.
Plate IV
Figs. 17–22. Development of the markings in Chærocampa Elpenor.
Fig. 17. Stage I.; larva one day after hatching. Natural length, 7.5 millim.
Fig. 18. Stage II.; larva after first moult. Length, 9 millim.
Fig. 19. Stage II.; immediately before the second moult (Fig. 30 belongs here). Length, 13 millim.
Fig. 20. Stage III.; after second moult. Length, 20 millim.
Fig. 21. Stage IV.; after third moult (Figs. 32 and 33 belong here). Length, 4 centim.
Fig. 22. Stage V.; after fourth moult. A feeble indication of an eye-spot can be seen on the third segment besides those on the fourth and fifth. Ocelli absent on segments 6–10.
Fig. 23. Stage VI.; after fifth moult. The subdorsal line is feebly present on segments 6–10, and very distinctly on segments 11 and 1–3. Ocelli repeated as irregular black spots above and below the subdorsal line on segments 6–11; a small light spot near the posterior border of segments 5–10 (dorsal spots) and higher than the subdorsal line. Larva adult.
Figs. 24–28. Development of the markings of Chærocampa Porcellus.
Fig. 24. Stage I.; immediately after emergence from the egg. Length, 3.5 millim.
Fig. 25. Stage II.; after first moult. Length, 10 millim.
Fig. 26. Stage III.; after second moult. Length, 2.6 centim.
Fig. 27. Eye-spots at this last stage; subdorsal much faded, especially on segment 4. Position the same as in last Fig.; magnified.
Fig. 28. Stage IV.; after third moult; corresponds exactly with Stage VI. of C. Elpenor. Dorsal view, with front segments partly retracted (attitude of alarm). Ocelli on segment 5 less developed than in Elpenor; repetitions of ocelli as diffused black spots on all the following segments to the 11th; two light spots on each segment from the 5th to the 11th, exactly as in Elpenor; subdorsal line visible only on segments 1–3. Length, 4.3 centim.
Fig. 29. Chærocampa Syriaca. From a blown specimen in Lederer’s collection, now in the possession of Dr. Staudinger. Length, 5.3 centim.
Fig. 30. First rudiments of the eye-spots of Chærocampa Elpenor, Stage II. (corresponding also with Fig. 19 in position, the head of the caterpillar being to the left). Subdorsal line slightly curved on segments 4 and 5.
Fig. 31. Eye-spots at Stage III. of the larva Fig. 20 somewhat further developed (larva immediately before third moult). Position as in Fig. 20.
Fig. 32. Eye-spots at Stage IV. corresponding to Fig. 21, A being the eye-spot of the fourth and B that of the fifth segment.
Fig. 33. Eye-spot at Stage V. of the larva of C. Elpenor; fourth segment.
Figs. 30–33 are free-hand drawings from magnified specimens.
Fig. 34. Darapsa Chærilus from N. America. Adult larva with front segments retracted. Copied from Abbot and Smith.
Fig. 35. Chærocampa Tersa, from N. America. Adult larva copied from Abbot and Smith.
Plate V
Fig. 36. Sixth segment of adult Papilio-larvæ; A, P. Hospiton, Corsica; B, P. Alexanor, South France; C, P. Machaon, Germany; D, P. Zolicaon, California.
Figs. 37–44. Development of the markings of Deilephila Euphorbiæ.
Fig. 37. Stage I.; young caterpillar shortly after emergence. Natural length, 5 millim.
Fig. 38. Similar to the last, more strongly magnified. Natural length, 4 millim.
Fig. 39. Stage II.; larva immediately after first moult. The row of spots distinctly connected by a light stripe (residue of the subdorsal line). Natural length, 17 millim.
Fig. 40. Stage III.; after second moult; magnified drawing of the last five segments. Only one row of large white spots on a black ground (ring-spots); subdorsal completely vanished; the shagreen-dots formerly absent now appear in vertical rows interrupted only by the ring-spots. Below the latter are some enlarged shagreen-dots which subsequently become the second ring-spots. Natural length of the entire caterpillar, 21 millim.
Fig. 41. Stage IV.; the same larva after the third moult. Transformation of the ground-colour from green to black, owing to the spread of the black patches proceeding from the ring-spots in Fig. 40 in such a manner as to leave between them only a narrow green triangle. The shagreen dots below the ring-spots have increased in size, but have not yet coalesced.
Fig. 42. Stage III.; larva, same age as Fig. 40, but with two rows of ring-spots. Natural length of the whole caterpillar, 32 millim.
Fig. 43. Stage V.; larva from Kaiserstuhl. Variety with only one row of ring-spots, and with red nuclei in the mirror-spots. Natural length, 5 centim.
Fig. 44. Stage V.; larva from Kaiserstuhl (like the three preceding). The green triangles on the posterior edges of the segments in Fig. 42 have become changed into red. Natural length, 7.5 centim.
Fig. 45. Deilephila Galii; Stage IV. Subdorsal with open ring-spots. Natural length, 3.4 centim.
Fig. 46. D. Galii; adult larva; Stage V. Brown variety with feeble shagreening; subdorsal completely vanished. Natural length, 6 centim.
Plate VI
Fig. 47. The same species at the same stage. Black variety strongly shagreened; similar to Deil. Euphorbiæ.
Fig. 48. Similar to the last. Yellow var. without any trace of shagreening.
Fig. 49. Deilephila Vespertilio. Three stages in the life of the species, representing three phyletic stages of the genus. A, life-stage III.=phyletic stage 3 (subdorsal with open ring-spots); B, life-stage IV.=phyletic stage 4 (subdorsal with closed ring-spots); C, life-stage V.=phyletic stage 5 (subdorsal vanished, only one row of ring-spots).
Fig. 50. Deilephila Zygophylli, from S. Russia; stage V. From a blown specimen in Staudinger’s collection. In this specimen the ring-spots are difficult to distinguish on account of the extremely dark ground-colour; they are nevertheless present, and would probably be more distinct in the living insect. A, open ring-spot from another specimen of this species in the same collection.
Fig. 51. Deilephila Nicæa, from South France; Stage V. Copied from Duponchel.
Fig. 52. Sphinx Convolvuli; Stage V., segments 10–8. Brown variety, with distinct white spots at the points of intercrossing of the vanished subdorsal with the oblique stripes.
Fig. 53. Anceyrx Pinastri; A and B, larvæ immediately after hatching. Natural length, 6 millim.
Fig. 54. Same species; Stage II. Subdorsal, supra- and infra-spiracular lines developed. Natural length, 15 millim.
Fig. 55. Smerinthus Populi; Stage I. Immediately after hatching; free from all marking. Length, 6 millim.
Fig. 56. Same species at the end of first stage; lateral aspect. Length, 1.3 centim.
Fig. 57. Same species; Stage II. Subdorsal indistinct; the first and last oblique stripes more pronounced than the others. Length, 1.4 centim.
Fig. 58. Deilephila Hippophaës; Stage III. Subdorsal with open ring-spot on the 11th segment. A, segment 11 somewhat enlarged. Length, 3 centim.
Plate VII
Fig. 59. Deilephila Hippophaës; Stage V. Secondary ring-spots on six segments (10–5).
Fig. 60. Same species; Stage V. One or two red shagreen dots on segments 10–4 in the position of the ring-spots of Fig. 59. Length, 6.5 centim.
Fig. 61. Same species; Stage V. Segments 9–6 of another specimen, more strongly magnified. A ring-spot on segments 9 and 8 showing its origin from two shagreen-dots; two red shagreen-dots on segment 7, on segment 6 only one.
Fig. 62. Deilephila Livornica (Europe) in the last stage. Green form. Copied from Boisduval.
Fig. 63. Pterogon Œnotheræ; Stage IV. Length, 3.7 centim.
Fig. 64. The same species at the same stage; dorsal view of the last segment.
Fig. 65. The same segment in Stage V. Eye-spot completely developed.
Fig. 66. Saturnia Carpini, larva from Freiburg; Stage III. Natural length, 15 millim.
Fig. 67. Same species; larva from Genoa; Stage IV. Length, 20 millim.
Fig. 68. Same species; larva from Freiburg; Stage III. Segments 8 and 9 in dorsal aspect. Length, 15 millim.
Fig. 69. The same caterpillar; lateral view of segment 8.
Fig. 70. Smerinthus Ocellatus; adult larva with distinct subdorsal on the six foremost segments. The shagreening is only shown in the contour, elsewhere omitted. Length, 7 centim.
Plate VII.
Aug. Weismann pinx.
Lith. J. A. Hofmann, Würzburg.
Plate VIII.
Aug. Weismann pinx.
Lith. J. A. Hofmann, Würzburg.
Plate VIII
Figs. 71–75 represent segments 8 and 9 of the larva of Saturnia Carpini (German form) in dorsal aspect, all at the fourth stage. The head of the caterpillar is supposed to be above, so that the top segment is the eighth.
Fig. 71. Saturnia Carpini. Darkest variety.
Fig. 72. Lighter variety.
Fig. 73. Still lighter variety.
Fig. 74. One of the lightest varieties; the black extends further on segments 9 and 10 than on the 8th.
Fig. 75. Lightest variety.
Figs. 76–80 are only represented on a smaller scale than the remaining Figs. in order to save space; were they enlarged to the same scale they would be larger than the other figures.
Fig. 76. Saturnia Carpini (Ligurian form); Segment 8; Stage V.
Fig. 77. Same form; same segment in stage VI.
Figs. 78, 79, and 80. Saturnia Carpini (German form); dorsal aspect of 8th segment in Stage V. (the last of this form).
Fig. 78. Darkest variety.
Fig. 79. Lighter variety.
Fig. 80. Lightest variety.
Figs. 81–86. Saturnia Carpini (German form); Stage IV. Side view of the 8th segment in six different varieties. Fig. 81 shows only two small green spots at the bases of the upper warts besides the green spiracular stripes. Fig. 82 shows the spots enlarged and increased by a third behind the warts; the pro-legs have also become green.
Fig. 83. Two of the three green spots, which have become still more enlarged, are coalescent.
Fig. 84. All three spots coalescent; but here, as also in
Fig. 85, various residues of the original black colour are left as boundary-marks.
Fig. 86. Lightest variety.
