Kitabı oku: «Non vowel resources of some good mood», sayfa 9
The new philosophy of life on a global plane is that the truth is in science, and that everyone has their own truth, laid down by higher forces and / or circumstances? Everyone wants to «take it out and lay it» precisely his truth, and everyone has their own truth? Many who want to teach you how to live, as if they are your bosses and know what you should do and what is right and what is wrong, but you yourself can be the same boss for those who «load you», teaching their lives? Life teachers need listeners, otherwise they are no longer life teachers, but ordinary people? Is a philosopher one who believes that his vocation is to implement many strategic plans? First, put ourselves in order, then the planet or vice versa? Are you going to rebuild the world, and eat fish with a knife, do not dig deeper than necessary – do you need to start small? Only science reveals the meaning of life, only in it the global meaning of human existence? Science does not bring income, income brings its practical application? Until science has given man everything that he wants, does he replace reality with fantasies? For science, all times are the same regardless of what is happening in the world or with any particular person, does it just go ahead with those who deal with it, not paying attention to anything?
Much seems impossible until you accomplish this. (Words attributed to Nelson Mandella)
How to find an equation that speaks of a plan of higher forces? The approximate considerations of the individualist anarchist theorist Max Stirner (Caspar Schmidt) in his work «The One and His Own» are as follows: «Just ask how to live, there will be so many teachers at once, and everyone will have their own program.» And the approximate words of Dr. Sartorius in the science fiction film «Solaris» (directed by Andrei Tarkovsky, USSR, 1972): «The main science, the rest is all a whim.» Sartorius, under whim, probably meant love and the instinct of procreation (he rebuked a colleague for not working, but lying in bed with a woman for ideological reasons), etc., in a word, that which is not new and repeats itself from century to century (love, sex, etc.), probably a whim, perhaps Sartorius is right, because only science brings something new, although there is also a need for something else.
The real story is not for those who are called impressionable: near the apartment building there were three kittens, they were fed all summer. One day they disappeared, on the fifth day they suggested that they could be taken to a nursery in order to euthanize, so to speak (to kill by injection), stray animals live in the nursery for five days, then they are euthanized. On the fifth day, three kittens were taken away, but two of them died, because in the nursery they became infected with a coronavirus, there can be many viruses – plague, rhinotracheitis. The question is – who and how could help the kittens after they became infected? Only science, because only it can invent a cure for disease.
I look beyond the foreign legion. (Reply from a guy serving in a French foreign legion talking about his ambitious intentions).
If someone ambitious chose the path of wealth, it was all already before – the rich existed before him, if someone chose the path of a criminal, it was all the same, if an alcoholic or drug addict or the path of a person with other standard addictions, this is also not new and everywhere in the aforementioned the outcome is predictable and predictable even by those who do not have the gift of psychic, if it certainly exists at all, it is enough to have life experience, and you can become a great predictor of the future with small errors in the predictions. Wealth is a relative substance under certain circumstances, of course, if it is wrong to act, although the elements can leave without wealth, and not just wrong actions. Remember how many businessmen committed suicide because they lost their status due to bankruptcy, and some people were proud to get to know them. In general, there is the concept of such a phobia as the fear of losing social status, the one who has it, or the «King Lear complex». Now they want to drive any fear into the framework of phobias, but such a fear as the fear of losing social status is rational when it exists, the one who is afraid of losing status does everything in order to maintain it, that is, it works, not sits idly by. The whole world is built on competition: systems compete among themselves, corporations – competition keeps everyone in good shape. The goal is not wealth, but psychological satisfaction and psychological comfort? Is wealth the goal of only a few, are people different? More importantly, the idea of enriching something, the idea of serving something and someone, or something else, or still to each his own?
One of the needs of some classical businessmen of the times of the author of this material, as already mentioned, is a wife or woman in every city, if it is a businessman-man, and sometimes so that everyone has a child from him.
If someone is ambitious, then wealth will definitely not give him an ideal opportunity to remain in history, because, as a rule, there are people like Spartak, Newton, Gagarin, Einstein, no one remembers the rich, well, unless their contemporaries know them. Again, if someone chose the way to have sex and see the meaning of life in it, it all went away too – it’s all for a short time, and about everything else temporary, all these scenarios are repeated, wars, revolutions, crimes, the only place you can find something new, this is really science, only in it there are discoveries of something new, unknown, and it gives what everyone aspires to – making life easier (by the way, it is not recommended to live by sex or any other short-term ideals, ideological vacuum when all this is gone).
Cyborg space and other high technology? Soylent – digital food and the social impact of this? 3D printers that print human organs, 3D printers on which, according to the media, plastic weapons are already made in 2016, and nano-printers that predict human viruses are printed – all this goes to the fact that the self-assembled tablecloth is from a fairy tale will become a reality? Not artificial intelligence, but digital intelligence as opposed to biological intelligence? Is human language the same as unit and zero for a computer – is it encoded information that a person transforms into images? The last evolution of man will be when man evolves into a machine or into something else, radically new? Why only science will give the desired person? Thanks to science, there will come a time when everyone has everything, a time when there will be what everyone needs, or when nobody will need anything, since there will be no needs? What is the scientist’s way of thinking – he doesn’t have thoughts regarding emotional experiences, he has an interest in something, and that’s it, it completely captures him?
Although almost all science fiction writers see the future of mankind in the apocalypse, in gray tones, we can assume, if we talk about the distant future, that everything will not be so bad in it, the character of a person due to the fact that science will go very far in everyone will have their own development as he wants, the appearance will also be what he wants, and in general the person will be what he wants, and to do what he wants, again thanks to scientific achievements, and it is not clear at all whether he wants something and needs something or, perhaps, a person will generally be in the form of something quantum. People will not, as in most science fiction novels, fight for survival, and if everything goes as good as it does now, everyone will only have to enjoy it, internal natural drugs endorphins (if necessary) or what something similar to them, giving a person a sense of pleasure at the moment only when he has done what is prescribed to him by a higher mind, for example, some business from which he enjoys will be present in the human body or whatever something similar to the human body, constantly, without any negative consequences for the body, as is the case with the artificial stimulation of the production of pleasure hormones by alcohol or drugs. In the future, there will probably be a real utopia, something like paradise, only on Earth, where everyone will be happy with everything, but, unfortunately, such a future has not come yet, and therefore most people have to deal with various psychological conditions by forces, but the Omega point, as it is called, when everything possible in terms of the development of science is reached and exhausted, it will come sooner or later, or maybe not, maybe the knowledge of science is endless?
Words attributed to K. Marx: «From each according to his capabilities, to each according to his needs.» But what to do when there is a need and not an opportunity? Do you need to match the needs with the possibilities?
Do we need to set priorities correctly, because different attitudes in the human mind cannot coexist peacefully, and attempts to achieve power over oneself are usually useless? What does the expression «his nerves lost» mean? This is when a person does what nature has long demanded of him or a program set by higher powers, but he endured? Can a cat rushing at a mouse walking next to it be called a case when the cat’s nerves are lost, but he does this because he is required to do so by what is called nature? A drowning man cannot help a drowning man – look for an assistant among those who are afloat, everyone is looking for ways to satisfy their needs, or will those who are satisfied with their life, each of whom knows perfectly well what the unknown needs? The psychological «infection» acts quickly: if you want to become the one who is called brave – talk to the brave, do you want to be impudent – talk to the impudent, with whom you will behave, what will you gain? How true is the phrase that the weak in some places and cases are exterminated (in the psychological sense), but negotiated with the strong? Let’s distract from what is written: while I was correcting the material and was on this page, representatives of the religious faith knocked on the door, gave a brochure and invited to church on Saturday, March 31, 2018.
Most people think that in life everything is so complicated, but in fact there is nothing complicated, everything is simple. When they go through life, they see the fundamental laws of the same life in action, the main thing is to know these laws (by the way, it is not recommended to think when it becomes difficult, that nobody is so hard, as, for example, those who think that it is difficult for them to remember that there are people who are much more difficult and who are in a much more difficult situation, for example, according to the media, in Africa 40,000 people die every day from hunger, who are also not cheerfully sentenced to life imprisonment, terminally ill people with disabilities), and generally difficult because then science has not yet figured out how to make it easy for everyone.
Nelson Mandella, who had been in prison for about 27 years, would probably happily switch places with an ordinary European who complains of stress, but the European would hardly want to change places with him, Mandella, nevertheless, showed what is called force spiritually, being in custody, this is a real politician, because a politician should not be afraid of prison, just like Perelman is a real scientist who refused a reward of one million US dollars, from this we can conclude that a person has no addictions to satisfy which e he would need this money, it’s clear that he doesn’t need to buy women, he doesn’t need to demonstrate wealth to people he knows and doesn’t, he’s not interested, he doesn’t get a dose of endorphin from this kind of behavior, he doesn’t need to be satisfied either more radical addictions, such as a love of drugs and alcohol, in short, worldly vanity does not interest him, all this is a whim, as Dr. Sartorius from the movie Solaris said.
A simple person has problems and black pages in history, historical blisters that like to fiddle with each other for any country – geopolitical opponents, speaking in a political sense. It is one thing that one tries to solve problems and forget, and the other does not – who remembers the story of two frogs that fell into milk? One drowned immediately, the other waved its paws until the milk was whipped into butter, and it got out, it also happens that a person wants and tries to solve problems, but again does not know how to do this, it’s kind of like they will let me or you make a detail on the machine, we will try, but we won’t succeed, therefore we need information and experience, how we need a «knowledgeable» in the squadron of aircraft or a person with experience in military operations, if there is a military situation somewhere, which will make experienced fighters out of recruits. It is hoped that everyone will become an experienced fighter in terms and meaning of psychological warfare and psychological operations, as some veteran of the military unit for psychological operations said.
PART 2. GLOBAL
The fact that we are created by higher forces, and the higher mind that created us controls us through pleasant sensations, is examined and proved, now, starting from this, do we go further in our reasoning? An unfortunate person is one who does not know what to do – a partial or complete lack of information makes a person unhappy? Is it wrong to see one thing in a person – only bad or only good, you need to decompose his personality into pros (positive) and minuses (negative)? It can’t be that a person is bad for everyone, for someone he will definitely be good – is this the effect of ants and a grasshopper?
Every person has something good, the main thing is to search him well. (Statement by a former police officer)
Everyone thinks that everything is confused in the relations between people, although in reality everything is clear and logical, unfortunately, as already mentioned, civilization is not yet developed so that all people can afford to relax 100% (maybe, somewhere they can so relax in rich countries, but in any case, not in all countries of the world), and so that cars can do everything for them, competition for a place in the sun continues to exist, and most importantly there is information in it, such as statistics, statistics can be operated as a means of persuasion, as well as using the statistics, you can know the real state of affairs (for example, you come to a new job, I tell you, «Do big plans,» you learn to qualified sources of the enterprise after worked, for example, a month and saw their performance, that is, nobody made a plan for you for a year and a half, and you made it, then you can operate on it when your bosses will push you, telling you that you work poorly), you also need to remember that you will not please everyone, which, as a rule, in some cases, pleasing someone wb problems differently. As my friend’s grandfather said in his childhood, when he saw that he put a grasshopper in an anthill to be eaten by ants and heard an answer from his grandson that he was doing well for ants: «Ants are good, but the grasshopper is not good.» This expression was mentioned at the beginning of this material.
The end of classical psychology – the beginning of another, unspoken, which can be found out only in the family if there is one? Secret psychology – a weapon of the XXII century? Does behind-the-scenes psychology lose relevance only in an ideal world?
Lyrics: a friend knew how to croak like a crow, when several ravens flew across from his window, he opened the window and began to croak, saying that this was a psychic attack, when he walked along the street and began to croak on a raven sitting on the ground, they were either alert or flew away – such a specialist in psychological warfare and psychological operations.
Probably, about 99% of firms in the countries of the former USSR refused «cold» (by telephone) sales of their products, sales representatives were hired, and sales began in the «field» in direct contact of the supplier through the sales representative with the client (director or merchandiser of the sales department trading facility or with the seller himself).
This refers to the fact that, as already mentioned, psychology must change, adapting to the realities of time, transform in connection with the realities of time, well, if not change, then at least be supplemented with something new. Classical psychology, nevertheless, probably cannot fulfill its tasks, the main of which is the creation of maximum psychological comfort. In classical psychology laboratories, qualitative methods are not being created to achieve maximum mental comfort, since many can hear statements that went to psychologists or psychotherapists, but nothing helped.
Need to transform according to the realities of time?
Illiteracy in the 21st century will not be those who do not know how to read and write, but those who do not know how to learn, unlearn and relearn.
Words attributed to futurologist Alvin Toffler.
Everything is transformed in connection with the realities of the time, and for psychology, as already mentioned, probably the time has come to do it, because absolutely everything has changed, the analog technique has changed to digital, but I have not heard that psychology has changed, it is clear that in some cases it stops work and fulfill their main function – ensuring the psychological comfort of people.
As an example of the need for modernization, let’s take an example from history, from which it can be seen that during the Great Patriotic War, the armament of Soviet tanks and their armor were such that they did not allow themselves to stand up for battle, in order for the tanks to be less vulnerable, they had to increase their armament and armor is an example of transformation with the realities of the time in the field of tank building. The tanks were redone so that they could carry out the assigned tasks with high quality. If modern classical psychology does not provide such armor and weapons (and does it provide any weapons or armor at all?), With which you can carry out your tasks efficiently, then something is wrong with it (there is talk of weapons in it, by the way, doesn’t go at all, the conversation is usually about the armor that the psychologist is trying to give to the client, and that one’s leaky, judging by the results, it looks like a tank from the time of the WWII before its alteration – this is the situation in psychology).
The author talked with people who visited a psychologist, and not one, therefore the opinion of these people about psychology was voiced, he did not have time to talk with some – they died. Classical psychology does not give instructions for the behavior of each individual individual and instructions for behavior in any emergency situation, she simply does not know it. How to behave a guest worker in a country when a security officer asks for money on the street for solving a problem and notify his own security service, this is impossible if he himself is forced to break the law without registering with the migration service, as to ask for money on the street, so as not to die of hunger when in a foreign country they cheated with wages, and you were left alone with your problems, without housing and a ticket for the return trip, does classical psychology give such advice?
By the way, when you ask for money, you need to be careful: when many get to the nearest law enforcement officer, they immediately «give up» (they say a rough synonym for the word) to those who ask for money, many citizens escape from boredom, calling people in uniform to those who drinking alcohol under their windows, taking pleasure in observing the removal process of those who drank alcohol, such a peculiar struggle for endorphins.
And we find the necessary «drivers», install, and everything is ready for the fulfillment of desires – since unfulfilled desires are the lack of information on how to fulfill them? Psychology for those over 30: Can psychology be divided not only into psychology for certain social groups, but also into psychology for a certain age? Are people unhappy not because of the economy, not because of the political regime, but because of the lack of objective information and because of the beliefs that make them unhappy? Mental illness from deterring not only sexual, but also other instincts? Sigmund Freud wrote that some get sick because they restrain sexual instincts, and some do not – just some sexual instincts are more pronounced than others? How can one explain the need to create problems of one person for another person for his negative behavior towards him – by the fact that someone’s negative behavior can jeopardize the mental state of the person against whom he was shown, or even the threat to life, and so on?
Know how. (English. «Know how», a fashionable expression in the 80s and 90s in the USSR).
We remember at the beginning of the material the statement that the availability of money exempts in some cases from the search for «drivers» necessary to achieve the goal, for money, for example, you can establish relationships with the opposite sex. «You’re lying more to uniformed employees on the street,» the migrant workers of other migrant workers teach at a construction site, «otherwise you won’t survive.» Would a psychologist give such advice? It is doubtful, only colleagues at a construction site, relatives (after all, they will not advise you badly), or very good friends can give such advice. But how can a person survive in a different way if he is put, for example, in a framework where the question arises not just about his comfortable psychological existence, but about physical, if not survival, then physical comfort? Or how to survive a person in such institutions as the army of the times of the USSR or prison, where sometimes you have to commit crimes (meaning bodily harm to someone who is trying to break you, causing you these very bodily injuries), and crimes are committed so that if you do not survive, then to exist normally there (army of the times of the USSR, prison of times of the USSR). Some may say that these are necessary measures of self-defense, nothing will happen if someone gives a rebuff – this can be answered by the fact that it will already be decided by the court, and the court can decide that there was no self-defense or it was exceeded. What is the advice of a psychologist when they try to «lower you» in the Soviet army or in a Soviet prison? What does Sigmund Freud or Karl Jung have to say about this? They strongly «wrapped up» on the sexual and attached a lot of importance to this – yes, mental disorders in a certain category of citizens are inevitable when suppressing such a powerful instinct as the reproductive instinct, but there are still a lot of other problems, instincts, which can also be slightly painful to suppress, if very vulnerable, in a word, it seems that Freud and Jung considered the problems of a certain sentimental and impressionable social stratum of that time, whose name is «bourgeois», and the problems of some ICU is an old saying, do not care about the sheriff. They beat you in the army or in prison – well, okay, there are more important questions, these are the problems of the sex life of the bourgeoisie of the times of Freud and Jung (by the way, neither in the army nor in the prison sex life with the opposite sex, as a rule, is not there at all happened with the sensitive bourgeois of that time, one can only guess), but the bourgeois is not to blame, they turned out as a result of certain social events.
Is life a struggle for the right to fulfill one’s dreams and desires? Is success a consequence of the effectiveness of certain actions? To each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities, and if there are many needs, but there are no abilities?
There are goals or needs, but there is no way to satisfy them, since there is not enough information about how everything works, everything or almost everything is incomprehensible, as none of the scientists currently understands the processes taking place in quantum physics, where there is complete chaos, but if you take a closer look, you can see those who have achieved a lot of things in life and are happy with everything, and it is precisely these who can be compared with scientists who comprehended the laws of quantum mechanics and even learned to control the processes taking place in it. But for some, some of the moments in life and everything connected with it remain the same unsolved, completely confused theoretical physics (by the way, for those who love the incomprehensible, the «observer effect» in quantum physics is a rather interesting thing), in which it’s not clear why ultrafine particles behave in no other way – when you observe them, they are matter, when you do not observe, they are a wave.
Bootcamp (American Army Training Center, training).
Do not let anyone manipulate yourself? A manipulator is sometimes the one who is called a non-independent person, the one who is constantly looking for a «boobs» to which you can stick and parasitize, or social «crutches» in the form of whom he will parasitize? They say that those who go to psychologists and psychiatrists are independent individuals? If you shout, it means you can’t solve the problem you’ve encountered, drink alcohol – the same thing? Try not to scream with outsiders, do not buy or drink alcohol – for a person who has life experience or just knowledge from someone, this will say that you are one of those who are called non-self-reliant? A manipulator is someone who is looking for stupid oneself? Under the influence of what is called propoganda, are those who are in a state of what is called depression, or those who do not have their own idea – do others give it to them? Words like a seed – sink into the soul and grow? An animal is that biological creature in which a ready-made program has eaten, multiplied, and no idea – is a person who can write the program himself and others? Are words the seeds that subsequently form a relation to the world? If you like a thing, music, and so on, then you are close in spirit to those who made this thing, music or anything else, and you would find a common language with it? Some, being at some work that oppresses them, look at those who also work at it and feel very comfortable at the same time, and think: «Why don’t I feel like that?» Yes, because it is not yours, look for something else?
There are many martial arts that teach you to protect yourself from one person’s physical assault on another, but hardly anyone has heard of any doctrine about protecting against psychological assault, hardly anyone knows something about some unspoken psychology in the sense of psychology, which uses martial arts of a psychological nature, at least nothing was found on the Internet on this subject, and hardly anyone has heard of trainers in this kind of psychology or anything like that.
It is worth trying to develop in the sense of being able to fend for oneself not only in the physical sense, since physical irritants in civilized countries are becoming and become, whatever you say, less than at the time when everything was decided by physical strength. Perhaps the time has come when the solution of problems through the use of physical force in most cases can only do harm (for example, if it is not used successfully, you can be deprived of freedom and go to jail), which is why it is recommended to learn how to survive without using it. But how, with what and from whom and from what to defend? There is something to be protected from, from what and from whom, but it is necessary to protect yourself, for example, from manipulators, both on a domestic and global level (remember the hidden advertisements that are used in cinema, paying money for it, and there is also lobbying for interests firms in the governments of some countries, lawmakers adopt the laws necessary for corporations). Manipulators want to use everyone for their own purposes in order to achieve the possibility of fulfilling their needs, for example, in money, and the methods of protection from various manipulating entities, probably, cannot be called other than unspoken psychologists, and there are people who successfully and successfully apply these methods they are used.
In unspoken psychology, as well as in martial arts, you can build up skills and knowledge, use elements of justifiable risk, as in special forces, when classes are as close as possible to faces in which there is a danger to life, but nonetheless everything happens reasonably and without loss. By the way, if anyone is interested, the training methods in the special forces of the USSR, currently in the former USSR countries, were the toughest in the world, it was allowed to use physical force to prepare a candidate. In some countries that were not part of the USSR, such rigidity is prohibited by law when preparing their special forces (it is probably believed that it makes no sense to cause damage to the candidate, since then which one will be the special forces).
To achieve something, you need to be different from others? Temporary abandonment of civilization and subsequent return to it is useful in some cases? Where to test the psyche – in the psychologist’s office, solving tests, or in extreme situations? I want to conduct psychological experiments on myself, putting myself in extreme places and situations?
«He who was not a revolutionary in his youth does not have a heart. Those who did not become conservatives in old age have no brains. ” Words attributed to Winston Churchill.
Returning to the last chapter, we can say that there was such a policy in the special forces of the former USSR countries in training personnel, since they needed to be different from others in order to achieve what those who did not want to be different from others did not achieve.
Ücretsiz ön izlemeyi tamamladınız.