Kitabı oku: «Beynəlxalq Münasibətlər üzrə bələdçi», sayfa 9
Deutsch. Karl W. (1953) Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Deutsch, Karl W. (1964) The Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.
Deutsch, Karl W. (1966) ‘Recent Trends in Research Methods in Political Science’, in C. Charlesworth James (ed.), A Design for Political Science: Scope, Objectives, and Methods. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, monograph 10.
Devetak, Richard (1996) ‘Postmodernism’, in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater (eds). Theories of International Relations, London: Macmillan. pp. 179-209.
Dews, Peter (1987) The Logics of Disintegration: Post-Structuralist Thought and the Claims of Critical Theory. London: Verso.
Dilthey, Wilhelm (ed.) (1976) Selected Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dingle, Herbert (1952) The Scientific Adventure: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. London: Pitman.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn (1997) ‘Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent—Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 3 (3): 365-92.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn (1999) ‘A Reply to Colin Wight’, European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3): 387-90.
Dougherty, James E. and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. (1996) Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 4th edn. New York and Harlow, UK: Longman.
Dunbar, Robin (1995) The Trouble with Science. London: Faber and Faber.
Dunne, Timothy (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Durkheim, Emile ([1938] 1964) The Rules of Sociological Method. London: The Free Press.
Dyke, Vemon Van (1960) Political Science: A Philosophical Analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Eagleton, Terry (1996) The Illusions of Postmodernism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Easton, David (1953) The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Easton, David (1965) A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (1997) ‘Evaluating Theories’, American Political Science Review, 91 (4): 923-6.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (1997) ‘Feminist Inquiry and International Relations’, in M. Doyle and J.G. Ikenberry (eds). New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder: West-view, pp. 77-90.
Enloe, Cynthia H. (1990) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. London: Pandora
Enloe, Cynthia H. (1993) The Morning After: Sexual Politics At the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Farrell, Frank B. (1996) Subjectivity, Realism and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fay, Brian (1996) Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ferguson, Yale H. and Mansbach, Richard W. (1988) The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Ferguson, Yale H. and Mansbach, Richard W. (1991) ‘Between Celebration and Despair – Constructive Suggestions for Future International Theory’, International Studies Quarterly, 35 (4): 363-86.
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1975) Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1981) Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1995) ‘Three Interviews with Paul K. Feyerabend’, Telos, 102: 115-48.
Foucault, Michel (1990) ‘On Power’, in Lawrence D. Kritzman (ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy and Culture, London: Routledge. pp. 96-119.
Friedman, Gil and Starr, Harvey (1997) Agency, Structure and International Politics. From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
Frost, Mervyn (1986) Towards a Normative Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frost, Mervyn (1996) Constitutive Theory: Towards an Ethics of International Relations. New York: Cambridge.
Gadamer, H.G. (1977) Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gamett, John C. (1984) Commonsense and the Theory of International Politics. London: Macmillan.
Garst, Daniel (1989) ‘Thucydides and NeoRealism’, International Studies Quarterly, 33 (I): 3-27.
George, Jim (1989) ‘International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the Third Debate’, International Studies Quarterly, 33: 269-79.
George, Jim (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
George, Jim and Campbell, David (1990) ‘Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference – Critical Social-Theory and International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 34 (3): 269-93.
Gilpin, Robert (1986) ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, in Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. pp.301-21.
Gordon, Scott (1991) The History and Philosophy of Social Science. London: Routledge.
Griffiths, Martin (1992) Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. London: Routledge.
Griffiths, Martin and O’Callaghan, Terry (2001) ‘The End of International Relations?’, in Robert M.A. Crawford and Darryl S.L. Jarvis (eds). International Relations – Still an American Social Science: Towards Diversity in International Thought, Albany: State University of New York. pp. 187-201.
Guetzkow, Harold (1950) ‘Long Range Research in International Relations’, American Perspective, 4 (Fall): 485-507.
Gunnell, John G. (1975) Philosophy, Science, and Political Inquiry. Momstowns, NJ: General Learning Press.
Gunnell, John G. (1998) The Orders of Discourse: Philosophy, Social Science and Politics. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Guzzini, Stefano (1993) ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’, International Organization, 47(3): 445-78.
Guzzini, Stefano (1998) Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.
Guzzini, Stefano (2000) 'A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 6 (2): 147-82.
Haack, Susan (1993) Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haas, Ernst B. (1991) ‘Reason and Change in International Life’, in Robert L. Rothstein (ed.), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. pp.189-220.
Haas, Michael (1969) ‘A Plea for Bridge Building in International Relations’, in Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds), Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp.158-76.
Habermas, Jurgen (1988) On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity.
Halfpenny, Peter (1982) Positivism and. Sociology. London: George Alien & Unwin.
Halliday, Fred (1994) Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Halliday, Fred (1996) ‘The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zaiewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 318-27.
Harding, Sandra (1991) Whose Science Whose Knowledge? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Harland, Richard (1987) Superstructuralism: The Philosophy of Structuralism and Poststructuralism. London: Routledge.
Harland, Richard (1993) Beyond Superstructuralism. London: Routledge.
Harre, Rom and Madden, Edward H. (1975) Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hartsock, Nancy (1983) ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in Sandra Harding and Merrill Hintikka (eds). Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Dordecht: D. Reidel. pp. 283-310.
Herman, C.F. and Peacock, G. (1987) ‘The Evolution and Future of Theoretical Research in Comparative Study of Foreign Policy’, in C.F. Herman (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy. Boston: Alien & Unwin. pp.13-32.
Hoffman, M. (1987) ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16 (2): 231-49.
Hoffman, Stanley (1961) ‘International Relations, the Long Road to Theory’, in James N. Rosenau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy. Glencoe: The Free Press, pp. 421-37.
Hoffman, Stanley, (1977) ‘An American Social Science:
International Relations’, Daedalus, 106 (3): 41-60. Hollis, Martin (1994) The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hollis, Martin (1996) ‘The Last Post?’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zaiewski (eds). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 301-8.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1991) ‘Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 17 (3): 393-410.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1992) ‘Structure and Action: Further Comment’, Review of International Studies, 18 (2): 187-8.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1994) ‘Two Stories About Structure and Agency’, Review of International Studies, 20(3): 241-51.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1996) ‘A Response: Why Epistemology Matters in International Theory’, Review a/International Studies, 11 (I): 111—6.
Holsti, K.J. (1985) The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Alien & Unwin.
Holsti, Kal (1989) ‘Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Which Are the Fairest Theories of All’, International Studies Quarterly, 33(2): 255-61.
Holsti, Kal J. (1998) ‘Scholarship in an Era of Anxiety:
The Study of International Relations During the Cold War’, Review of International Studies, 24 (Special Issue): 17-46.
Honig, Jan Wilhelm (1996) ‘Totalitarianism and Realism: Morgenthau's German Years’, in Benjamin Frankel (ed.), Roots of Realism. London: Frank Cass. pp. 283-313.
Hoole, Francis W. and Zinnes, Dina A. (eds) (1976) Quantitative International Politics: An Appraisal. London: Praeger.
Hopf, Ted (1998) ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23(1): 171-201.
Horkheimer, Max (1982) Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum.
Horkheimer, Max (1993) Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Husseri, Edmund (1982) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (trans. F. Kersten). The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Jackson, Leonard (1991) The Poverty of Structuralism. Harlow: Longman.
Jarvis, D.S.L. (2000) International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism. Columbia: University of Southern Carolina.
Jessop, Bob (1990) State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place. Cambridge: Polity.
Jorgenson, Knud Erik, (2000) ‘Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret’, European Journal of International Relations, 6 (1): 9-42.
Kaplan, Abraham David Hannath (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler.
Kaplan, Morton (1957) System and Process in International Politics. New York: John Wiley.
Kaplan, Morton (1969) ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’, in James Rosenau (ed.), Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 39-61.
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Krasner, Stephen D. (1998) ‘International Organization and the Study of World Polities’, International Organization, 52(4): 645-85.
Keohane, Robert O. (1989) ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, in Robert O. Keohane (ed.), International Institutions and State Power. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 158-79.
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James N. (1969a) Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James N. (1969b) ‘Tradition and Science in the Study of International Polities’, in Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds), Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3-19. Kolakowski, Leszek (1969) The Alienation of Reason: A History of Positivist Thought (trans. Norbert Guterman). New York: Anchor Books.
Rratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2000) ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's “Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29 (1): 73-104.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970) ‘Reflections on my Critics’, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231-78.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1982) ‘Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability’, paper presented at the PSA, East Lansing, Michigan.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1990) ‘Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation’, in C. Wade Savage (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp.298-318.
Kurzweil, Edith (1980) The Age of Structuralism: Levi-Strauss to Foucault. New York: Columbia University Press.
Laffey, Mark and Weldes, Jutta (1997) ‘Beyond Belief:
Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 3 (2): 193-237.
Lakatos, Imre (1970) ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research’, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-195.
Lane, Robert E. (1966) ‘The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledgable Society’, American Sociological Review, 31 (October): 656-7.
Lane, Ruth (1996) ‘Positivism, Scientific Realism and Political Science’, Journal oj'Theoretical Politics, 8 (3): 361-82.
Lapid, Yosef (1989) ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’, International Studies Quarterly, 33 (22): 235-54.
Laski, Harold J. (1935) The State in Theory and Practice. London: George Alien & Unwin.
Lasswell, Harold Dwight and Kaplan, Abraham (1950) Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laudan, Larry (1996) Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method and Evidence. Boulder: Westview.
Layder, Derek (1994) Understanding Social Theory. London:Sage.
Lemer, Daniel (1965) Cause and Effect. London: The Free Press.
Linklater, Andrew (1990) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Lijphart, Arend (1974a) ‘International Relations Theory: Great Debates and Lesser Debates’, International Social Science Journal, 26 (1): 11—21.
Lijphart, Arend (1974b) ‘The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 18 (1): 41-74.
Little, Richard (1980) ‘The Evolution of International Relations as a Social Science’, in R.C. Kent and G.P. Nielsson (eds). The Study and Teaching of International Relations: A Perspective on Mid-Career Education. London: Frances Pinter. pp. 1—27.
Little, Richard and Smith, Michael (eds) (1991) Perspectives on World Politics. London: Routledge.
Long, David (1995) ‘Conclusion: Inter-war Idealism, Liberal Internationalism and Contemporary International Theory’, in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds), Thinkers of the Twenty Years Crisis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 302-28.
Long, David and Wilson, Peter (eds) (1995) Thinkers of the Twenty Years Crisis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Maclntyre, Alasdair (1973) ‘The Idea of Social Science’, in Alan Ryan (ed.), The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15-32.
Mackenzie, W.J.M. (1967) Politics and Social Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Mackenzie, W.J.M. (1971) The Study of Political Science Today. London: Macmillan.
Mackinnon, Edward A. (ed.) (1972) The Problem of Scientific Realism. New York: Appleton-Century-
Crofts.
Maclean, John (1981) ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of Change and the Study of International Relations’, in Barry Buzan and R.J, Barry Jones (eds), Change in the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. London: Frances Pinter. pp. 46-67.
Manicas, Peter T. (1987) A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Blackwell.
Mann, Michael (1996) ‘Authoritarian and Liberal Militarism: A Contribution from Comparative and Historical Sociology’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zaiewski (eds). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221-39.
Marx, Karl (1962) ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon’, in Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels: Selected Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Marx, Karl (1966) Capital, vol. III. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Masterman, Margaret (1970) ‘The Nature of a Paradigm’, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59-89.
Meehan, Eugene J. (1968) Explanation in Social Science: A System Paradigm. Homewood: Dorsey Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1940) ‘Positivism, Functionalism and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 34 (April): 260-84.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1946) Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 5th edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1972) Science: Servant or Master? New York: W.W. Norton.
Morrow, Raymond A. and Brown, David D. (1994) Critical Theory and Methodology. London: Sage.
Nagel, Ernest (1961) The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Neufeld, Mark (1994) ‘Reflexivity and International Relations Theory’, in Claire Turenne Sjolander and Wayne S. Cox (eds). Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations. London: Lynne Rienner. pp. 11-35.
Neufeld, Mark (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholson, Linda J. (ed.) (1993) Feminism/ Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
Nicholson, Michael (1983) The Scientific Analysis of Social Behaviour: A Defence of Empiricism in Social Science. London: Pinter.
Nicholson, Michael (1996a) Causes and Consequences in International Relations: A Conceptual Study. London: Pinter.
Nicholson, Michael (1996b) ‘The Continued Significance of Positivism?’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zaiewski (eds). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128-45.
Nicholson, Michael (2000) ‘What's the Use of International Relations?’, Review of International Studies, 26 (2}: 183-98.
Nicholson, Michael and Bennett, Peter (1994) ‘The Epistemology of International Relations’, in A.J.R. Groom and Margot Light (eds). Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London: Pinter; New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 197-205. Ogley, Roderick C. (1981) ‘International Relations: Poetry, Prescription or Science’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2): 170-86.
Oldroyd, David (1986) The Arch of Knowledge. London: Methuen.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood (1989) World of Our Mating: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood (1998) The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osterud, Oyvind (1996) ‘Antinomies of Postmodernism in International Studies’, Journal of Peace Research, 33 (4): 385-90.
Ostemd, Oyvind, (1997) ‘Focus on Postmodernism’, Journal of Peace Research, 34 (3): 337-8.
Outhwaite, William (1975) Understanding Social Life: The Method Called 'Yerstehen'. London: Alien & Unwin.
Outhwaite, William (1987) New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. London: Macmillan.
Owen, David (ed.) (1997) Sociology after Postmodernism. London: Sage.
Patomaki, Heikki, (1996) ‘How to Tell Better Stories About World Polities’, European Journal of Inlernalional Relations, 2 (1): 101-33.
Patomaki, Heikki (1997) ‘The Rhetorical Strategies and the Misleading Nature of Attacks on “Postmodernism”: Reply’, Journal of Peace Research, 34 (3): 325-9.
Patomaki, Heikki (2001) After International Relations. Critical Realism and the (Reconstruction of World Politics. London: Routledge.
Palomaki. Heikki and Wight, Colin (2000) ‘After PoslPositivism: The Promise of Critical Realism’, International Studies Quarterly, 44 (2): 213-37. Porpora, Douglas V. (1987) The Concept of Social Structure. Westport: Greenwood.
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (1998) ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations, 4 (3): 259-94.
Psillos, Stathis (1999) Scientific Realism. London: Routledge.
Puchala, Donald J. (1991) ‘Woe to the Orphans of the Scientific Revolution’, in Robert L. Rothstein (ed.), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. pp.39-60.
Rabinow, Dreyfus (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rengger, Nicholas J. (1989) ‘Incommensurability, International Theory and the Fragmentation of Western Culture’, in J. Gibbins (ed.), Contemporary Political Culture: Politics in a Postmodern Age. London: Sage. pp.237-50.
Rengger, N. and Hofflnan, M. (1990) ‘Modernism, Post-Modemism and International Relations’, in J. Doherty (ed.). Postmodernism in the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan. pp. 127-47.
Reynolds, Charles (1973) Theory and Explanation in International Politics. London: Robertson. Rosenau, James N. (1971) The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. New York: The Free Press.
Rosenau, Pauline (1990) ‘Once Again into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19 (1): 83-110.
Rosenau, Pauline (1992) Post-modemisn and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads and Intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ruggie, John Gerard (1998) Constructing the World Polity: Essays On International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.
Ryan, Alan (1996) ‘Hobbes's Political Philosophy’, in Tom Sorell (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 208-45. Sankey, Howard (1994) The Incommensurability Thesis Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sankey, Howard (1997) Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict New York: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, Brian (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Searle, John R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin.
Shapiro, Ian and Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘The Difference that Realism Makes: Social Science and the Politics of Consent’, Politics and Society, 20 (2): 197-223.
Singer, J. David (1961) ‘The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations’, in Klaus Knorr and Sidney Verba (eds). The International System: Theoretical Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 77-92.
Singer, J. David (1969) ‘The Incompleat Theorist: Insight Without Evidence’, in Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds). Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp.62-86.
Skocpol, T. (1987) ‘The Dead End of Metatheory’, Contemporary Sociology, 16(1): 10-12.
Smith, Hazel (1996) ‘The Silence of Academics: International Social Theory, Historical Materialism and
Political Values', Review of International Studies, 22(2): 191-212.
Smith, Steve (1987) ‘Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science’, Millennium, 16 (2): 186-206.
Smith, Steve (1992) ‘The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations’, Millennium, 21 (3): 489-506.
Smith, Steve (1995) ‘The Self Images of a Discipline: A
Genealogy of International Relations Theory’, in International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1-37.
Smith, Steve (1996) ‘Positivism and Beyond’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zaiewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11—44. Smith, Steve (1997) ‘Epistemology, Postmodernism and
International Relations Theory’, Journal of Peace Research, 34 (3): 330-6.
Smith, Steve (2000) ‘Wendt's World’, Review of International Studies, 26 (1): 151-63.
Snyder, Richard C., Bruck, H.W. and Sapin, Burton (1954) Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Snyder, Richard C., Bruck, H.W. and Sapin, Burton (eds) (1962) Foreign Policy Decision-Making. New York: The Free Press.
Sorell, Tom (ed.) (1996) ‘Hobbes Scheme of the Sciences’, in Tom Sorrell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45-61.
Sorenson, G. (1998) ‘IR after the Cold War’, Review of International Studies, 24 (Special Issue): 83-100.
Stockman, Norman (1983) Antipositivist Theories of the Sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Strauss, Leo (1953) Natural Right and History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Suganami, Hidemi (1996) On the Causes of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suganami, Hidemi (2000) ‘Agents, Structures and Narratives’, European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3): 365-86.
Sylvester, Christine (1993) Feminist Theory and International Relations Theory in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles (1987) ‘Overcoming Epistemology’, in
K. Baynes, J. Bohman and P.A. McCarthy (eds), After Philosophy: End or Transformation? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 464-88.
Tellis, Ashley J. (1996) ‘Political Realism: The Long March to Scientific Theory’, in Benjamin Frankel (ed.), Roots of Realism. London: Frank Cass. pp. 3-94.
Thompson, John B. (ed.) (1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tickner, J. Ann (1992) Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives On Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen (1970) ‘Does the Distinction Between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water?’, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-47.
Trigg, Roger (1993) Rationality and Science: Can Science Explain Everything? Oxford: Blackwell.
Tudor, Andrew (1982) Beyond Empiricism: Philosophy of Science in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Vasquez, John A. (1995) ‘The Post-Positivist debate’, in Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds), International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge. Polity Press. pp. 217-40.
Vasquez, J.A. (1997a) ‘War Endings: What Science and Constructivism Can Tell Us’, Millennium, 26 (3): 651-78.
Vasquez, John A. (1997b) ‘The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition’, American Political Science Review, 91 (4): 899-912.
Vasquez, John A. (1998) The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vico, Giambattista ([1744] 1984) The New Science of Giambattista Vico: unabridged translation of the third edition. London: Comell University Press.
Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi, Mark V. (1987) International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism. New York: Macmillan.
Waever, Ole (1996) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Inter- paradigm Debate’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zaiewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149-85.
Walker, R.B.J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Wallace, William (1996) ‘Truth and Power, Monks Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22 (3): 301-21.
Walt, Stephen M. (1997) ‘Evaluating Theories’, American Political Science Review, 91 (4): 931-4.
Waltz, Kenneth (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1997) ‘Evaluating Theories’, American Political Science Review, 91 (4): 913-7.
Wasby, Stephen L. (1970) Political Science – The Discipline and Its Dimensions. New York: Scribner's.
Weber, Max (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences (trans. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch). New York: The Free Press.
Wendt, Alexander E. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization, 41 (3): 335—70.
Wendt, Alexander, E. (1991) ‘Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 17 (4): 383-92.
Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Polities’, International Organization, 46 (2): 391-425.
Wendt, Alexander (1995) ‘Constructing International Polities’, International Security, 20 (1): 71-8.
Wendt, Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, Alexander (2000) ‘On Constitution and Causation in IR’, Review of International Studies, 24 (Special Issue): 101-17.
Wight, Colin (1996) ‘Incommensurability and Cross Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory: What's the Frequency Kenneth?’, Millennium, 25(2): 291-319.
